On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 15:41 -0400, Willie Walker wrote:
> The current version of gnome-speech is 0.4.11, with the '0' in there to
> indicate a lack of courage to just call it 1.0. :-) In general (not
> just for gnome-speech), I sure find it confusing to know which versions
> of which modules go
For gnome-speech: it's mostly in maintenance mode, with drivers for new
speech engines to be added over time. When something changes in
gnome-speech, I tend make a new release of gnome-speech to coincide with
the next point release of whatever happens to be coming out (i.e.,
either even or odd),
On 4/19/07, Torsten Schoenfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
>
> > It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and
> > provide corrections and clarifications:
> >
> > http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateRelease
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> It'd be really helpful if people could read over my initial draft and
> provide corrections and clarifications:
>
> http://live.gnome.org/ReleasePlanning/SeparateReleaseCycleModules
The list says that "the entire perl bindings suite" is
> I think this is what NewStuffManager is trying to solve:
> http://www.k-d-w.org/NewStuffManager/
Indeed. I have contacted the author and he needs some manpower making
gnome apps support NSM.
I would love it if a good number of gnome apps had an optional
dependency on NSM for 2.20. That way, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob Bradford schrieb:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:54 +0200, David Prieto wrote:
>> Plugin management in Gnome is suboptimal; it depends on a given package
>> being in your distro's repos, which gives no room for new packages.
>> Installing a plugin for
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:54 +0200, David Prieto wrote:
> Plugin management in Gnome is suboptimal; it depends on a given package
> being in your distro's repos, which gives no room for new packages.
> Installing a plugin for Rhythmbox is a real pain in the ass, if it's not
> in the repos.
>
> Why
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 19 avril 2007, à 01:43, Nate Nielsen a écrit :
>> Jon Nettleton wrote:
>>> Okay well I will get moving on that. One thing that could really help
>>> is to start a gnome-keyring mailing list. There has been talk about one
>>> on and off for over a year now. It would
Le jeudi 19 avril 2007, à 01:43, Nate Nielsen a écrit :
> Jon Nettleton wrote:
> > Okay well I will get moving on that. One thing that could really help
> > is to start a gnome-keyring mailing list. There has been talk about one
> > on and off for over a year now. It would really help concentrat
heya,
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 10:54 +0200, David Prieto wrote:
> Plugin management in Gnome is suboptimal; it depends on a given package
> being in your distro's repos, which gives no room for new packages.
> Installing a plugin for Rhythmbox is a real pain in the ass, if it's not
> in the repos.
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007, Elijah Newren wrote:
> I have no problem with gnome-mag using libcolorblind -- once there's a
> more stable/reliable download location for it. Could we get one?
I've contacted the upstream (and Debian) maintainer of libcolorblind,
Daniel Ruoso, as soon as you mentionned st
On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 11:42 -0600, Elijah Newren wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> So I was trying to improve our release documentation by coming up with
> a list of modules in official GNOME release sets that do not follow
> the GNOME release cycle, such as gtk+. We have discouraged adding
> such modules as
12 matches
Mail list logo
