Deskbar branched for 2.20

2007-06-08 Thread Raphaël Slinckx
Hi ! A late announcement (shame on me) about the branching of deskbar-applet. Stable series continues in the gnome-2-18 branch in SVN, the new development continues in trunk. There is also a special branch for this cycle called GSOC_2007 where Sebastian Pölsterl one of our Summer of Code

Re: libpcre: external dependency for gnome-system-monitor?

2007-06-08 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2007-06-07 klockan 19:35 skrev Jan de Groot: On Thu, 2007-06-07 at 15:01 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote: I think GRegex already requires pcre ? I can see that glib requires pcre 7.0 to build. So what's wrong ? glib ships an internal snapshot for that. So if people really really insist on

Offering a GStreamer-based alternative to gnome_sound in libgnome

2007-06-08 Thread Philipp Kerling
Hi, it was discussed several times to port GNOME to use GStreamer instead of ESD. Unfortunately no one actually did it. Now I tried to implement some of the ideas mentioned in [1] and ended up with a DBus-based daemon that loads the samples into memory and the clients can play them by using their

Re: libpcre: external dependency for gnome-system-monitor?

2007-06-08 Thread Elijah Newren
On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: or use the new GRegex? I think GRegex already requires pcre ? I can see that glib requires pcre 7.0 to build. So

Re: libpcre: external dependency for gnome-system-monitor?

2007-06-08 Thread Elijah Newren
On 6/8/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's now optionnal but enabled by default. Is that OK ? What does enabled by default mean? Does it mean that it will link to pcre if found and still build if not found, or does it mean that it if pcre is not available then an error will

Re: libpcre: external dependency for gnome-system-monitor?

2007-06-08 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le vendredi 08 juin 2007 à 08:39 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit : On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: or use the new GRegex? I think GRegex already