On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 14:46:05 +0100
Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 22:52 +1000, Lex Hider wrote:
>
> > >From what I could understand, the answer was that gnome isn't compatible
> > with the freedesktop trash spec.
> >
> > http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifi
If this is fixed in gnome-vfs, will there be some sort of migration
path so that users don't end up with orphaned ~/.Trash folders? Can
the trash be configured to show things from the old directory as well,
if it exists?
Martin
On 10/4/07, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007
On Thu, 2007-10-04 at 22:52 +1000, Lex Hider wrote:
> >From what I could understand, the answer was that gnome isn't compatible
> with the freedesktop trash spec.
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/trash-spec
gnome-vfs trash support existed well before the trash specification,
he
On Thu, 04 Oct 2007 22:52:34 +1000
Lex Hider wrote:
> Why does gnome put files in .Trash instead of .local/ ?
AFAIK, because GNOME's trash appeared before freedesktop.org spec.
> Is the gnome trash implementation compatible with the above spec?
No.
> Is there any reason the project couldn't adop
Am Donnerstag, den 04.10.2007, 22:52 +1000 schrieb Lex Hider:
> >From what I could understand, the answer was that gnome isn't compatible
> with the freedesktop trash spec.
>
> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/trash-spec
> [...]
> Is the gnome trash implementation compatible with the
Hi,
I'd like to preface my remarks by saying that I make them as a user and
not a developer. I also am not making them from a kde or gnome
perspective, but as a user who is caught in the middle.
I have long been annoyed and perplexed by the different behaviours of
deleting files in "gnome" and "k
ons, 03.10.2007 kl. 19.23 -0400, skrev Matthias Clasen:
> On 10/3/07, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > All this should just come from libc. I don't think we should do anything
> > special here at all. I think all the needed data is available in the
> > locale data.
>
> That is
On Wed, 2007-10-03 at 19:23 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Kjartan Maraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > All this should just come from libc. I don't think we should do anything
> > special here at all. I think all the needed data is available in the
> > locale data.
>
> That i
