On 10/8/07, Edwin Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been doing a lot of research lately, and have decided that I want to
> start developing gnome panel applets. Unfortunately, all of the tutorials
> are outdated (with the latest one I found being dated 15 April 2007).
> Furthermore, it wou
Hey All:
Just wanted to drop a note regarding the GNOME Boston Accessibility
Summit. Many thanks for letting us have the room to hammer away on
problems and planning, and many thanks to Owen Taylor for all the work
he did.
I think the GNOME Boston Accessibility Summit went very very well this
Stable branch is gnome-2-20
We hope next stable release will bring us a lot of useful features like
imported GSoC annotations work, DVI specials support. Probably there
will be time to solve zoom problems for big zoom. But the main priority
will be stability, test coverage and proper documentation
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 16:41 +0200, Frederic Crozat wrote:
> Le mardi 09 octobre 2007 à 16:17 +0200, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > El lun, 08-10-2007 a las 22:26 +0200, Matteo Settenvini escribió:
> > >
> > > It also seems to be actively developed, and is shipped by default with
> > > Fedora 8.
> > >
El mar, 09-10-2007 a las 16:41 +0200, Frederic Crozat escribió:
> Le mardi 09 octobre 2007 à 16:17 +0200, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> > El lun, 08-10-2007 a las 22:26 +0200, Matteo Settenvini escribió:
> > >
> > > It also seems to be actively developed, and is shipped by default with
> > > Fedora 8.
>
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 19:20 -0500, Travis Watkins wrote:
> On 10/8/07, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > That's a bug in ALSA, and it's getting fixed (in ALSA) for when playing
> > sounds, and more recent Pulseaudio will release the device when no
> > streams are playing (thus avoiding
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:09 +0200, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:04 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> > GNOME seems like it's far too high in the stack to include a sound
> > server & API - shouldn't we simply depend on it, rather than integrating
> > it into the GNOME platfor
Le mardi 09 octobre 2007 à 16:17 +0200, Pacho Ramos a écrit :
> El lun, 08-10-2007 a las 22:26 +0200, Matteo Settenvini escribió:
> >
> > It also seems to be actively developed, and is shipped by default with
> > Fedora 8.
> >
>
> Also will be the default in upcoming Mandriva 2008
This is abso
El lun, 08-10-2007 a las 22:26 +0200, Matteo Settenvini escribió:
>
> It also seems to be actively developed, and is shipped by default with
> Fedora 8.
>
Also will be the default in upcoming Mandriva 2008
> Can it be eligible for inclusion in GNOME 2.22?
>
+1
Thanks a lot :-)
___
On 10/9/07, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I am not saying Pulse Audio has these problems. I simply don't know
That can easily be helped. Just try gnome 2.20 with pulseaudio in Fedora 8.
It works beautifully.
And once you tried, you don't have to spread FUD anymore...
_
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:45 +, Sam Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:52:14 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
>
> > I don't care only about proprietary applications. You think for example
> > that Second Life Linux client (which is open source) will use Pulse
> > Audio API directly?
On Ter, 2007-10-09 at 21:15 +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > Why be forced to use a userspace mixing program when hardware mixing would
> > work equally well (or better) in most situations?
>
> Because the vast majority of audio hardware available today does not *do*
> hardware mixing, *and* Pu
> Why be forced to use a userspace mixing program when hardware mixing would
> work equally well (or better) in most situations?
Because the vast majority of audio hardware available today does not *do*
hardware mixing, *and* PulseAudio provides many more features and benefits
to users than just
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 11:52, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> I don't care only about proprietary applications. You think for example
> that Second Life Linux client (which is open source) will use Pulse
> Audio API directly? It will take years before that happens. I remember
> perfectly well
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 10:52:14 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> I don't care only about proprietary applications. You think for example
> that Second Life Linux client (which is open source) will use Pulse
> Audio API directly? It will take years before that happens. I remember
> perfect
On Ter, 2007-10-09 at 01:17 +0200, Matteo Settenvini wrote:
> Il giorno lun, 08/10/2007 alle 23.19 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro ha
> scritto:
> > Last time I tried PulseAudio (over a year ago) it hogged the sound
> > device and did not let any other ALSA client produce sound.
> >
> > Can some
Hi,
On Tue, 2007-10-09 at 10:04 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> GNOME seems like it's far too high in the stack to include a sound
> server & API - shouldn't we simply depend on it, rather than integrating
> it into the GNOME platform?
Could you perhaps consider to integrate it nicely but not to depe
Hi,
Matteo Settenvini wrote:
> I'm running pulseaudio since four or five months now on two of my
> desktop systems, both x86 and PPC, and I must say that I'm really
> satisfied by it.
...
> Can it be eligible for inclusion in GNOME 2.22?
GNOME seems like it's far too high in the stack to incl
18 matches
Mail list logo
