dobre večer,
vincent already blogged[1] about Google's Highly Open Participation
Contest[2] (GHOP).
it's a contest similar to summer of code, but for high school students
and with much smaller tasks in any fields (like doc, code, translation,
a11y or whatever). the average amount of time to be spe
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 00:34 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> Owen Taylor wrote:
> > If you are connecting on an insecure network (say coffee shop wireless)
> > then a https connection to an untrusted certificate is a distinctly weak
> > form of security.
> >
> > It tells you that you have a encrypted
Xavier Bestel wrote:
> Le mardi 04 décembre 2007 à 14:29 +, Stef Walter a écrit :
>> I'd like to propose [1] that we do away with these dialogs in GNOME. In
>> my opinion if we cannot verify the certificate, then we should simply
>> not show the UI elements that indicate a secure connection. We
Owen Taylor wrote:
> If you are connecting on an insecure network (say coffee shop wireless)
> then a https connection to an untrusted certificate is a distinctly weak
> form of security.
>
> It tells you that you have a encrypted connection to *somebody*.
>
> - Owen
>
> (And note that Stef's p
Adam Schreiber wrote:
> On Dec 4, 2007 9:29 AM, Stef Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I'd like to propose [1] that we do away with these dialogs in GNOME. In
>> my opinion if we cannot verify the certificate, then we should simply
>> not show the UI elements that indicate a secure connection. W
Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:29 +, Stef Walter wrote:
>> Dan Winship got me thinking about the "unable to verify identify of this
>> certificate" dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
>> otherwise unverifiable certificates.
>>
>> I'd like to propose [1] that we d
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 16:28 +, Stef Walter wrote:
>> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:47 +, Stef Walter wrote:
However I'm not sure of the correct autovoodoo to remove the soname and
libtool la file. The Makefile.am file is here:
Le mardi 04 décembre 2007 à 14:29 +, Stef Walter a écrit :
> Dan Winship got me thinking about the "unable to verify identify of this
> certificate" dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
> otherwise unverifiable certificates.
>
> I'm sure others have come to this conclusion: Th
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:45 -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> Owen Taylor wrote:
> > If you are connecting on an insecure network (say coffee shop wireless)
> > then a https connection to an untrusted certificate is a distinctly weak
> > form of security.
> >
> > It tells you that you have a encrypte
Owen Taylor wrote:
> If you are connecting on an insecure network (say coffee shop wireless)
> then a https connection to an untrusted certificate is a distinctly weak
> form of security.
>
> It tells you that you have a encrypted connection to *somebody*.
That is correct, of course. It is, howe
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:38 -0500, Pat Suwalski wrote:
> Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> >>> Unfortunately, one of the main UI elements that indicate a secure
> >>> connection is the https:// URL in the URL bar. Are you proposing to
> >>> disgui
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 17:20 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro wrote:
> On Ter, 2007-12-04 at 16:38 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 16:28 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> > > Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:47 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> > > >> However I'm no
Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam Schreiber wrote:
>>> Unfortunately, one of the main UI elements that indicate a secure
>>> connection is the https:// URL in the URL bar. Are you proposing to
>>> disguise that as well?
>> Maybe just not shade it yellow. It will still
On Dec 4, 2007 11:35 AM, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:29 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> > Dan Winship got me thinking about the "unable to verify identify of this
> > certificate" dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
> > otherwise unverifiable cer
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 12:12 -0500, Adam Schreiber wrote:
> > Unfortunately, one of the main UI elements that indicate a secure
> > connection is the https:// URL in the URL bar. Are you proposing to
> > disguise that as well?
>
> Maybe just not shade it yellow. It will still be running over ssl
>
On Ter, 2007-12-04 at 16:38 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 16:28 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> > Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:47 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> > >> However I'm not sure of the correct autovoodoo to remove the soname and
> > >> libtool la fil
On Dec 4, 2007 11:35 AM, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:29 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> > Dan Winship got me thinking about the "unable to verify identify of this
> > certificate" dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
> > otherwise unverifiable cer
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 16:28 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:47 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> >> However I'm not sure of the correct autovoodoo to remove the soname and
> >> libtool la file. The Makefile.am file is here:
> >>
> >> http://svn.gnome.org/vi
On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 14:29 +, Stef Walter wrote:
> Dan Winship got me thinking about the "unable to verify identify of this
> certificate" dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
> otherwise unverifiable certificates.
>
> I'm sure others have come to this conclusion: These are s
Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 19:47 +, Stef Walter wrote:
>> However I'm not sure of the correct autovoodoo to remove the soname and
>> libtool la file. The Makefile.am file is here:
>>
>> http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnome-keyring/trunk/pkcs11/Makefile.am?view=markup
>
> Remove
On Dec 4, 2007 9:29 AM, Stef Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose [1] that we do away with these dialogs in GNOME. In
> my opinion if we cannot verify the certificate, then we should simply
> not show the UI elements that indicate a secure connection. We should
> just act as if t
Dan Winship got me thinking about the "unable to verify identify of this
certificate" dialogs we see in browsers when using self-signed or
otherwise unverifiable certificates.
I'm sure others have come to this conclusion: These are some of the most
useless dialogs that exist, a major cop out. They
22 matches
Mail list logo
