On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 17:33 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
Does Anjuta have (or do the developers plan to have)
glade-like or devhelp-like functionality built in
I had some long chats with Naba at foss.in this year, and among other
things I saw devhelp and glade3 integrated in seamlessly [I gather
If you aren't giving a talk but are coming, please let us now at
http://live.gnome.org/Brussels2007#attendees !
The correct link is obviously http://live.gnome.org/Brussels2008#attendees ;)
Christophe
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
On 06/01/2008, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007, à 04:52 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/anjuta/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gdl/trunk/
On Jan 6, 2008 10:00 PM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
We do want the stand-alone apps for the old coders like us, don't we? I
don't think it's only a few coders here and there...
(there's integration with glade3 and devhelp in anjuta)
I think we want stand alone apps too, in
On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 11:47:55PM +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le jeudi 20 décembre 2007, à 04:52 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Homepage: http://anjuta.sourceforge.net/
svn/git/bzr/...: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/anjuta/trunk/
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gdl/trunk/
Hi all!
Just to note:
a) There is a bug about wrong translation:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496833
We tried to resolve issues that are brought up here!
b) There is a GHOP task to improve UI strings:
Hi.
I've got a few bugreports in bugzilla asking to add more schema entries
for various stuff in libgnome and wanted to check whether this still is
considered the place to do that or if we should avoid adding more
API/ABI to these libs.
I guess we need to migrate the lot of them if we are to get
Hi.
I've got a few reports in bugzilla with patches to add more schema
entries in libgnome. Is it ok to keep adding API/ABI to these deprecated
libs or should we seek to put them elsewhere?
I guess we'll have to migrate the whole lot to some other place at some
point anyway if we are to get rid
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 20:07 +0100, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
Hi.
I've got a few reports in bugzilla with patches to add more schema
entries in libgnome. Is it ok to keep adding API/ABI to these deprecated
libs or should we seek to put them elsewhere?
I guess we'll have to migrate the whole
On Jan 7, 2008 4:47 PM, Johannes Schmid [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all!
Just to note:
a) There is a bug about wrong translation:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496833
We tried to resolve issues that are brought up here!
I don't like the idea of packing lots of new bugs in the
Hi,
On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 23:47 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Summary so far:
===
+ nothing :-)
+ FWIW, anjuta was proposed for 2.18, but there were no 2.x release at
this point and the 1.2.x versions were unmaintained.
+ Comments from the thread on the old proposal:
Hi,
Bastien did some kick-ass work to produce a standalone version of
libgweather (previously in gnome-applets). This will be needed when we
finish merging intlclock into gnome-panel's clock applet, as gnome-panel
obviously can't be made to depend on a library that lives inside
gnome-applets.
On Mon, 2008-01-07 at 19:34 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Bastien did some kick-ass work to produce a standalone version of
libgweather ... With Matthias's help, I've been fixing up libgweather
and it's now make dist-able.
Awesome!
[This is not to be an API-stable platform library,
13 matches
Mail list logo
