Kjartan/Willie:
fr., 19.09.2008 kl. 00.34 +0200, skrev Vincent Untz:
Le mercredi 17 septembre 2008, à 17:23 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit :
Well...hmm...if I read the answers correctly, I think what I'm hearing
is that there are a lot of great ideas, but they aren't done yet. If
this is the
2008/9/18 Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> "* GtkAdjustment now enforces that values are restricted to the
> range [lower, upper - page_size]. This has always been the documented
> behaviour, and the recommended practice is to set page_size to 0
> when using adjustments for simple scalar
I created gnome-2-24 stable branch for Empathy. See the Roadmap[1] for
more details of what's coming in trunk.
Xavier Claessens.
[1] http://live.gnome.org/Empathy/Roadmap
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnom
Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Did I miss something that said that this issue only applies if you're using
glade? What about projects that don't use glade and set the page_size
attribute in code?
Nobody said that it only a
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Jonathon Jongsma
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Did I miss something that said that this issue only applies if you're using
> glade? What about projects that don't use glade and set the page_size
> attribute in code?
Nobody said that it only affects glade-using
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size
You should look for glade files too, I guess.
I've run this on my jh
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:39 AM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 22:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > Would it be possible to reconsider this change? That's somewha
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 2:50 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:09 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
>> I believe the goal is to use some uncatchable keyboard sequence a'la
>> Windows' secure auth (Ctrl+Alt+Del).
> This is kind of silly; I have to type a
> This is kind of silly; I have to type a complex keyboard combination in
> order to input a password? That is annoying. Additionally, switching
It makes a lot of sense in some environments and not a lot of sense in
many others.
> VTs in Linux is usually slow; more annoyance. Expect some resis
On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 13:09 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Someone who has gained a user privilege could possibly show a fake
> > password input dialog that looks exactly like a "real" password prompt,
> >
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this is a major issue, we should either reach consensus that GTK+
should revert this ASAP or decide to fix all our .glade/.ui files now.
The latter won't help with applications we don't maintai
So...I think it boils down to whether people with disabilities can log
into the desktop or not. I'm not sure I've really seen a good answer
on this.
Will
On Sep 19, 2008, at 3:21 AM, Kjartan Maraas wrote:
fr., 19.09.2008 kl. 00.34 +0200, skrev Vincent Untz:
Le mercredi 17 septembre 2008, à
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone who has gained a user privilege could possibly show a fake
> password input dialog that looks exactly like a "real" password prompt,
> thereby learning the root password.
>
> Same thing with VT swiching
fr., 19.09.2008 kl. 00.36 +0200, skrev Vincent Untz:
> Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size
>
> You should look for glade files too, I guess.
>
None of the glade files in /usr/share on my machine
wOn Thu, 2008-09-18 at 22:55 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Stef:
>
> > Is there a standard way or goal for the UI and behavior of password
> > prompts on the desktop? Besides having as few as possible, that is.
>
> There is Trusted Path to consider. To meet Trusted Path requirements,
> any entry
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If this is a major issue, we should either reach consensus that GTK+
> should revert this ASAP or decide to fix all our .glade/.ui files now.
> The latter won't help with applications we don't maintain, though.
Fixing seem
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 10:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> > Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size
> >
> > You s
Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 22:25 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Sebastien Bacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Would it be possible to reconsider this change? That's somewhat a
> > compatibility breakage and will create issues in lot of softwares.
> >
Le vendredi 19 septembre 2008, à 00:36 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
> Le jeudi 18 septembre 2008, à 21:53 +0200, Kjartan Maraas a écrit :
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] share]$ find . -name *.ui | xargs grep page_size
>
> You should look for glade files too, I guess.
I've run this on my jhbuild of GNOME
fr., 19.09.2008 kl. 00.34 +0200, skrev Vincent Untz:
> Le mercredi 17 septembre 2008, à 17:23 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit :
> > Well...hmm...if I read the answers correctly, I think what I'm hearing
> > is that there are a lot of great ideas, but they aren't done yet. If
> > this is the case,
20 matches
Mail list logo
