On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:35 +, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> pros:
> - current proxy handling in GNOME is a huge mess, we're all lucky we can live
> without proxies
> - the API looks extremely sane
> - there is nothing else that does proxying
> - Dan (who is going to be the main - or only? - user of i
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:21 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:35 +, Benjamin Otte wrote:
> > pros:
> > - current proxy handling in GNOME is a huge mess, we're all lucky we can
> > live
> > without proxies
> > - the API looks extremely sane
> > - there is nothing else that
2008-10-24 klockan 11:40 skrev Emmanuele Bassi:
> but humour me: where would you put this functionality? and saying
> libgnome or gtk+ is not going to cut it.
libsoup perhaps?
— Wouter
--
:wq mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/10/24 Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> - yet another library, slowing applications startup.
Actually, I've been thinking about this problem lately. Why don't
people use dlopen() more often? If you use a library in your app which
is not intrinsically essential to it (like gtk+ is) why are
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 12:04 +0200, Wouter Bolsterlee wrote:
> 2008-10-24 klockan 11:40 skrev Emmanuele Bassi:
> > but humour me: where would you put this functionality? and saying
> > libgnome or gtk+ is not going to cut it.
>
> libsoup perhaps?
er...
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/desktop-devel
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:09 +0100, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote:
> In this specific library case, since the API is so simple and you
> don't know you need it until you somehow check your app's settings
> it's a no-brainer really.
You could lazy-load the library when you need to access a URL, but th
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 11:09 +0100, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote:
> 2008/10/24 Xavier Bestel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > - yet another library, slowing applications startup.
>
> Actually, I've been thinking about this problem lately. Why don't
> people use dlopen() more often? If you use a library in y
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Patryk Zawadzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:08 PM, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, 2008-10-23 at 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
>>> A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
>>> Apache pack
Juan Jesús Ojeda Croissier wrote:
> And what about Cherokee?
>
> http://www.cherokee-project.com
>
> It's small, modular, very light and easy to run as a user in specific
> port (to avoid bother system web servers, for example)
>
> http://www.cherokee-project.com/doc/bundle_cherokee-worker.html
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
> default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
> installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of
> Patryk, PLD Linux also star
Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
>> Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
>> default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
>> installing a server wants it to be started. From what I read of
>> P
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 18:22 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> Yeah, I have the same problem with Glom's dependency on PostgreSQL.
> Debian/Ubuntu users get an unused PostgreSQL instance even when Glom
> isn't running, just because its Debian policy to run any services that
> are installed, wit
On Solaris, apache daemon is disabled by default aswell.
Matt
Vincent Untz wrote:
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008, à 14:38 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
Bastien already wrote about Fedora policy, httpd is disabled by
default. I know that Debian policy is to consider that the user
installing a
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
> Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a
> matter of binary size.
>
> What do distributors think?
I think we could split the web server
Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 16:41 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> > I doubt our server guys will get overly happy over the idea of
> > disabling a typical server daemon just so you can integrate it with
> > GNOME. I don't really think I want the server team to hate the GNOME
> > team any more.
>
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:11 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 18:22 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > Yeah, I have the same problem with Glom's dependency on PostgreSQL.
> > Debian/Ubuntu users get an unused PostgreSQL instance even when Glom
> > isn't running, just beca
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> SQLLite can't do what PostgreSQL can do, which is why PostgresSQL
> exists. For instance:
> - Multi-user and the relevant locking.
> - Access control.
> - Network access.
As these are not things necessary for a UI generator, I t
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 18:07 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 17:58 +0200, Murray Cumming a écrit :
> > SQLLite can't do what PostgreSQL can do, which is why PostgresSQL
> > exists. For instance:
> > - Multi-user and the relevant locking.
> > - Access control.
> > - Net
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I also think that Apache is a bad choice. If you need a good web server
> with DAV support, please think of lighttpd instead, or - much better -
> of a libsoup-based implementation.
There's also security issues to consider.
One good th
On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 06:19:54PM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > Whoa? There is no Debian package simply because no one had stepped up so
> > far. Christophe Sauthier is starting to work on it, and I will help him
> > to get the necessary changes in postgresql.
>
> Thanks.
BTW, I talked to one
Em Qui, 2008-10-23 às 14:53 +0100, Bastien Nocera escreveu:
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> But one of the main shorter term goals is to get the desktop sharing
> feature of vino integrated into gnome-user-share.
> http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 12:53 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> As I said, it's clear to me that Apache does meet our goals here. If you
> want to propose something else, the burden is on you to provide evidence
> that what you propose is not only reasonably secure, but also have good
> proces
On Fri, 24.10.08 20:14, Josselin Mouette ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 12:53 -0400, David Zeuthen a écrit :
> > As I said, it's clear to me that Apache does meet our goals here. If you
> > want to propose something else, the burden is on you to provide evidence
> > tha
Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
why a web server is needed for sharing files.
2008/10/23, Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Heya,
>
> I'd be interested in getting gnome-user-share into GNOME 2.26.
>
> Currently, gnome-user-share is a simple capplet and "da
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 21:11 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
> Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
> why a web server is needed for sharing files.
WebDAV is supported natively with Bonjour/Zeroconf in MacOS X and
Windows, and is very well supported in GVFS and Nautil
Le vendredi 24 octobre 2008 à 20:58 +0200, Lennart Poettering a écrit :
> I don't think that this kind of FUD about Apache is very
> constructive. Just because lighttpd has a "light" in its name it
> doesn't mean that Apache is a slow huge beast. That is nonsense.
And just because Apache is famous
On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 15:16 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> Le jeudi 23 octobre 2008 à 17:02 +0200, Frederic Peters a écrit :
> > A point Patryk touched is that generic distributions will provide
> > Apache packages configured to run at startup, so it is not just a
> > matter of binary size.
> >
2008/10/24 Bastien Nocera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 21:11 +0200, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
>> Isn't that what nfs does? Or for that matter, ftp? I don't understand
>> why a web server is needed for sharing files.
>
> WebDAV is supported natively with Bonjour/Zeroconf in MacOS X and
28 matches
Mail list logo
