Il giorno ven, 21/11/2008 alle 23.39 +0100, Andre Klapper ha scritto:
> Am Freitag, den 14.11.2008, 22:33 +0100 schrieb Luca Ferretti:
> > Both ExternalDeps pages on live.gnome.org for 2.24 and 2.26 suggest
> > version 2.5.6.
> >
> > But this version is form unstable branch (see [1]) and 2.6.0 (st
During the 2.25 release cycle I would like to move GNOME Power Manager
away from a HAL dependency and onto a new DeviceKit-power dependency.
DeviceKit-power is a new mechanism daemon that moves the battery
profiling and statistics interface system-wide, and also does the
history recording once per
hi;
while I really love DeviceKit, there are a couple of questions I'd like
to have an answer:
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 18:25 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> DeviceKit-power and DeviceKit-disks just depend on the trivial DeviceKit
> daemon which is a thin dbus wrapper around udev.
while DeviceKit h
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 1:32 PM, Emmanuele Bassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi;
>
> while I really love DeviceKit, there are a couple of questions I'd like
> to have an answer:
>
> On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 18:25 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
>> DeviceKit-power and DeviceKit-disks just depend on the
Le lundi 24 novembre 2008 à 18:25 +, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> DeviceKit-power is a new mechanism daemon that moves the battery
> profiling and statistics interface system-wide, and also does the
> history recording once per system, rather than once per session. It also
> moves to an interface
2008/11/24 Richard Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Q: Why is system wide better?
> A: There's no point doing the data collection, statistics profiling and
> calculations in every session on a multiuser workstation. There's also
> the point that at GDM you run a g-p-m instance, which doesn't have
>
thanks, Matthias.
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 13:45 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> > (thinly veiled self-interest: when is DeviceKit-disks going to be
> > released, so we can dump gfloppy and use DK-disks that instead?)
>
> I don't think there has been a proper DeviceKit-disks release yet.
> The curr
Le lundi 24 novembre 2008, à 18:25 +, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> Q: Is anything else going to use DeviceKit-$foo?
> A: In the future gvfs will depend on DeviceKit-disks, not HAL
Does it sound possible to port all GNOME away from hal to DeviceKit-$foo
in the 2.26 timeframe?
Vincent
--
Les ge
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le lundi 24 novembre 2008, à 18:25 +, Richard Hughes a écrit :
>> Q: Is anything else going to use DeviceKit-$foo?
>> A: In the future gvfs will depend on DeviceKit-disks, not HAL
>
> Does it sound possible to port all G
> interaction e.g. for device locking). If a few core modules (gvfs,
> nautilus, gnome-mount) are ported to hal, we should be in good shape
> for 2.26.
>
You probably mean migrated to DeviceKit (or migrated away from hal)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing li
Richard Hughes wrote:
> During the 2.25 release cycle I would like to move GNOME Power Manager
> away from a HAL dependency and onto a new DeviceKit-power dependency.
Will g-p-m break on non-DeviceKit-powered systems or will it handle
this case gracefully, falling back to the current code ?
Che
11 matches
Mail list logo
