Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009, à 10:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 19:18 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > > > - Split Brasero into a library (available on trunk) named > > > libbrasero-media that is being documented (devhelp) and re-arranged so > > > we can deliver a

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Luis Medinas
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 12:29 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote: > Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009, à 10:59 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit : > > Le lundi 12 janvier 2009 à 19:18 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit : > > > > - Split Brasero into a library (available on trunk) named > > > > libbrasero-media that is being

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Vincent Untz
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009, à 12:25 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : > Right now Brasero is currently re-licensing the library again, we > already contacted the people involved asking about the change. There > were some bits in the library that Philippe re-wrote (that used NCB > code) to be compatibl

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 13:22 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009 à 12:55 +0100, Rodrigo Moya a écrit : > > > If the two applets don’t share the basic UI (one panel applet and one > > > notification icon), that’s a bigger problem. I guess we could always > > > ship the GStreamer

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > yeah, I agree with you, I think both should be the same (an applet or an > icon), so since we already have the applet, I guess it would make sense > to add code to the applet to hide itself and start the notification icon > if PA is running,

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 10:55 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > But this is not a runtime decision. Either your distro is using > pulseaudio (and it should) Again, this cannot be a distribution choice! We can ship PA by default and make everything possible to get the best of it, but breaki

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Matthias Clasen
2009/1/16 Josselin Mouette : > Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 10:55 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : >> But this is not a runtime decision. Either your distro is using >> pulseaudio (and it should) > > Again, this cannot be a distribution choice! > > We can ship PA by default and make everything pos

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread David Zeuthen
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 17:12 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 10:55 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > > But this is not a runtime decision. Either your distro is using > > pulseaudio (and it should) > > Again, this cannot be a distribution choice! > > We can ship PA

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.01.09 17:12, Josselin Mouette (j...@debian.org) wrote: > Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 10:55 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > > But this is not a runtime decision. Either your distro is using > > pulseaudio (and it should) > > Again, this cannot be a distribution choice! > > We can

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Frederic Crozat
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 11:31 -0500, David Zeuthen a écrit : > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 17:12 +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote: > > Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 10:55 -0500, Matthias Clasen a écrit : > > > But this is not a runtime decision. Either your distro is using > > > pulseaudio (and it sho

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Lennart Poettering
On Fri, 16.01.09 17:49, Frederic Crozat (fcro...@mandriva.com) wrote: > No, it is not THAT simple. > > We (Mandriva) are shipping PA and it works for most users, but there are > users with problems (either ALSA related or PA related, Colin Guthrie is > always making sure those issues are reported

Re: GNOME 2.26 module inclusion discussion heats up

2009-01-16 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 17:35 +0100, Lennart Poettering a écrit : > Hmm. Somehow I get the feeling that the only distribution where this > really matters is Debian Not quite; AFAIK Gentoo and OpenSolaris have not embraced PulseAudio as well. > -- because you guys want to ship all and > eve

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Philippe Rouquier
Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009 à 14:06 +0100, Vincent Untz a écrit : > Le vendredi 16 janvier 2009, à 12:25 +, Luis Medinas a écrit : > > Right now Brasero is currently re-licensing the library again, we > > already contacted the people involved asking about the change. There > > were some bits i

Documentation for 2.26 Proposed Modules

2009-01-16 Thread Shaun McCance
This email contains a documentation status report for the proposed modules for Gnome 2.26. This has nothing to do with my personal opinion of whether or not these modules should be included. I'm just letting the community know where we stand with respect to documentation. ** brasero ** Brasero a

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Brian Cameron
Philippe: As Luis said I'm not against relicencing the library (and even the whole of brasero). It's just I wasn't aware of the issue at stake since I don't care much about licencing (which turns out to be a mistake). Regarding libbrasero-media, it shouldn't take long as I wrote all of the co

Re: Brasero improvements over the 2.26 release cycle

2009-01-16 Thread Shaun McCance
On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 18:38 +0100, Philippe Rouquier wrote: > - One last thing, if I want to relicence brasero as a whole what about > artwork (and translation, and documentation) that was submitted? > Should I require the permission from the people who did this (great) > work? Otherwise, I will of

mathusalem

2009-01-16 Thread fabio duchi
Hi to all, this's my first attempt to be usefull to this comunity ... a lot of time ago I had saw the begin of the project named "mathusalem". Because I like the idea behind, I tried to do another version of mathusalem that could satisfy the request specified in http://live.gnome.org/Mathusalem; y