Natan Yellin wrote:
> I gave a talk at the Boston Summit about problems with the developer
> website. Even though most of the issues have been fixed, the slides are
> still relevant to other parts of gnome.org.
>
> http://live.gnome.org/ProblemsWithBeginnerDocumentation
Good; could you report is
2009/2/9 Matteo Settenvini
> On lun, 2009-02-09 at 11:00 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote:
> >
> > We do get volunteers on a semi-regular basis, but we inevitably
> > lose them. It would be useful to identify why we lose them and
> > fix those problems. I'll readily admit that I'm partially at
> > fa
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:10 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 13:44 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> > not even clear in the GDP documentation how to generate a damn
> > thing from the .xml file.
gnome-doc-tool html foo.xml
OK, our documentation in general is outdated, and that's n
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 16:22 +0900, Davyd Madeley wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 21:37 +, Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> > More good news: That's also often unnecessary. A description of a
> > feature in checkbox-by-checkbox detail is just as boring to read as it
> > is to write. Instead, thi
On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 13:44 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> not even clear in the GDP documentation how to generate a damn
> thing from the .xml file.
You don't need to generate anything. yelp renders DocBook XML files
directly, though I only manage to do that by dragging and dropping from
nautilus t
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 9:09 AM, API wrote:
> From: Luis Villa
>
>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > We are proud to announce that a new GNOME team has been created, focused on
>> > desktop testing automation.
>> > If you have ever wondered how could you t
Le mardi 10 février 2009, à 15:13 +0100, Ara Pulido a écrit :
> It was announced in the gnome-announce-list.
For future reference: announcements like this are 100% appropriate for
devel-announce-list too ;-)
Vincent
--
Les gens heureux ne sont pas pressés.
__
It was announced in the gnome-announce-list.
You can see the archive at
http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-announce-list/2009-February/msg00036.html
Cheers,
Ara.
API wrote:
From: Luis Villa
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido wrote:
Hello,
We are proud to announce that a new
From: Luis Villa
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > We are proud to announce that a new GNOME team has been created, focused on
> > desktop testing automation.
> > If you have ever wondered how could you test your application writing
> > scripts that mimic wh
FWIW, this was originally on gnome-announce; for those who aren't on
that list (1) you should be (2) here is the version with all the links
included ;)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ara Pulido
Date: Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM
Subject: New Desktop Testing team
To: gnome-announce
Yup, I hope we can reuse lots of that work in Sugar, though we would
need to add AT-SPI support to hippo canvas first (or move to another
canvas).
Cheers,
Tomeu
2009/2/10 Willie Walker :
> +1 -- I'm very excited about this. Many thanks to the people involved who
> have the energy and courage t
+1 -- I'm very excited about this. Many thanks to the people involved
who have the energy and courage to pull this off.
Will
On Feb 10, 2009, at 8:48 AM, Luis Villa wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido wrote:
Hello,
We are proud to announce that a new GNOME team has been cre
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 4:14 AM, Ara Pulido wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We are proud to announce that a new GNOME team has been created, focused on
> desktop testing automation.
> If you have ever wondered how could you test your application writing
> scripts that mimic what a normal user would do, join u
2009/2/9 Murray Cumming :
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 19:14 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>>
>> I've been thinking how hard would it be to have a very basic webkit
>> based editor that would convert the html it generates into docbook?
>
> Impossible, or crappy at best. HTML doesn't know that something is
On 2009-02-09, 17:37 GMT, Dan Winship wrote:
> 1. Users don't have the manual, and if they did, they wouldn't
>read it.
> 2. In fact, users can't read anything, and if they could, they
>wouldn't want to.
As much as I like Joel and his writing (and particulary this one
about user interface
15 matches
Mail list logo
