El dl 09 de 02 de 2009 a les 19:14 +, en/na Alberto Ruiz va
escriure:
> 2009/2/9 Shaun McCance :
> > On Sat, 2009-02-07 at 10:16 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >> - Are we just waiting for some corporate sponsors to pick up the docs
> >> where Sun left them many years ago ?
> >
> > Corporate c
On 2/10/09, Gil Forcada wrote:
>
>
> Stormy is asking for ideas and topics for spend the advisory fundings,
> so why not propose a hackfest-like meeting for documentation, by now all
> hackfests have been related to programming and usability, maybe a
> documentation+translation can (and it's se
Hi
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 11:02 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 23:44 -0500, manoj kp kp wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm an egnineering student and thinking about modifying TOTEM MOVIE
> > PLAYER by inlcuding
> >
> > * a LIBRARY in so as to keep track of all the files played
Hi
In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
Example:
http://crash.gnome.org/report/index/8d6249b4-f79f-11dd-8569-0007e9333148?date=2009-02-10-18
Is
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:00 -0500, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Hi
>
> In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
> Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
> returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
>
> Example:
> http://crash.gnome.or
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Hubert Figuiere wrote:
> Hi
>
> In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
> Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
> returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
>
> Example:
> http://crash.gnome.org/
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
> Hi
>
> In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
> Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
> returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 error.
>
> Example:
> http://crash.
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
>> Hi
>>
>> In GNOME 2.24 and up, BugBuddy no longer send the crash reports to
>> Bugzilla. It send them to a misterious crash.gnome.org, and the URL
>> returned by bugbuddy to the user leads to a 503 erro
gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
You can now check them out by doing:
git clone ssh://@git.gnome.org/git/
or, if you don't have an account on gnome.org:
git clone git://git.gnome
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
> The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
Does this mean the GNOME move to git is complete and the git
repositories are now writeable a
On 02/11/2009 12:54 PM, John Stowers wrote:
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
Does this mean the GNOME move to git is complete
Le jeudi 12 février 2009, à 09:54 +1300, John Stowers a écrit :
> On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 17:25 -0200, Johan Dahlin wrote:
> > gobject-introspection, gir-repository and gjs were today moved over to git.
> > The old svn repositories will still work, but only in read-only mode.
>
> Does this mean the
Ahoi,
Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 12:00 -0500 schrieb Hubert Figuiere:
Is there any plan to remove Bug Buddy now that it has been made useless?
Your reasoning is strange. Wouldn't it make more sense to fix
crash.gnome.org? Or did we gave up on software quality?
I
Hej hej,
Am Mittwoch, den 11.02.2009, 22:58 +0100 schrieb Tobias Mueller:
> I'd say it'd be the best to remove that whole crash.gnome.org thing from
> bugbuddy as there is obviously nobody who is able to manage that
> platform. I assume that bugbuddy would then send to b.g.o only.
Before I'd be
2009/2/11 Tobias Mueller :
> I'd say it'd be the best to remove that whole crash.gnome.org thing from
> bugbuddy as there is obviously nobody who is able to manage that platform. I
> assume that bugbuddy would then send to b.g.o only.
I agree with dropping crash.g.o but I'd rather see app like app
15 matches
Mail list logo