On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:37 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>> 2009/4/6 Jason D. Clinton :
>> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Tomas Frydrych
>> > wrote:
>> >> mainstream user. There are good reasons to provide legacy support, and
>> >> it's grea
On Mon, 2009-04-06 at 17:37 +0100, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> 2009/4/6 Jason D. Clinton :
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Tomas Frydrych
> > wrote:
> >> mainstream user. There are good reasons to provide legacy support, and
> >> it's great to be able to run GNOME on a machine that is 5 years old,
Gnome 3 presents us with a wonderful opportunity to get
documentation right. I believe documentation will be
very important to the success of a new user experience.
Furthermore, I believe that we have a rare chance to
bring out new documentation with a bang. If we do it
right, people will take no
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> You are missing the remote desktop scenario here. This is not only a
> matter of working on old hardware, being able to run gnome smoothly on
> a thin client solution through XDM, or VNC, or whatever is also
> needed.
VNC is not an issue--it
2009/4/6 Jason D. Clinton :
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
>> mainstream user. There are good reasons to provide legacy support, and
>> it's great to be able to run GNOME on a machine that is 5 years old, but
>> it must be seen for what it is -- legacy support, it cannot
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
> mainstream user. There are good reasons to provide legacy support, and
> it's great to be able to run GNOME on a machine that is 5 years old, but
> it must be seen for what it is -- legacy support, it cannot be where the
> collective effort
Josselin Mouette wrote:
> I don’t think maintaining a few more packages (especially packages that
> already exist today) is a big effort. But it stills bother me if we are
> going to propose two entirely different user experiences with two
> different configurations. For the end user, it will just
2009/4/6 Adam Schreiber :
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ted Gould wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:17 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>>> There's one obvious question related to those potential changes: what
>>> will happen to the old way of doing things? For example, will we still
>>> make the
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Ted Gould wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:17 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> There's one obvious question related to those potential changes: what
>> will happen to the old way of doing things? For example, will we still
>> make the GNOME Panel available if, for so
Le lundi 06 avril 2009 à 17:10 +0300, Stefan Kost a écrit :
> Andre Klapper schrieb:
> > Ahoj,
> >
> > a draft for the GNOME 2.27 & 2.29 schedule is now available at
> >
> > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven .
> >
> > The schedule also includes a plan to clean up the platform by get
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:17 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> There's one obvious question related to those potential changes: what
> will happen to the old way of doing things? For example, will we still
> make the GNOME Panel available if, for some reason, people are not
> immediately happy with GNOME
On Fri, 2009-04-03 at 14:31 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> Le jeudi 02 avril 2009, à 11:44 -0400, Willie Walker a écrit :
> > For developers local to the Boston area, I'm happy to take a visit to
> > your sight to go over accessibility considerations and to discuss your
> > new UI's with you from
Le samedi 04 avril 2009 à 15:33 +0200, Dodji Seketeli a écrit :
> Then why not just run the current metacity + gnome applet combinations of
> today
> on that hardware ? Assuming metacity + current gnome applets are not going to
> vanish all of a sudden.
>
> Of course, that would result in more wo
Hey!
Just wanted to let you know that I branched the stable tree off into the
"gnome-2-26" branch. trunk will be used for development again.
The MaintainersCorner page says I should give a little Roadmap.
Well, of course we'd like to get as much done as possible as time
permits. ;-)
See Claudio's
Calum Benson a écrit :
> I guess the other category here is the current generation of thin
> clients... not 'legacy hardware' by any means, they just aren't really
> designed for this sort of thing.
Then why not just run the current metacity + gnome applet combinations of today
on that hardware ?
Andre Klapper schrieb:
> Ahoj,
>
> a draft for the GNOME 2.27 & 2.29 schedule is now available at
>
> http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyseven .
>
> The schedule also includes a plan to clean up the platform by getting
> rid of deprecated modules.
> Maintainers can see the GNOME 3 readines
Hi there.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 2:52 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
>
> This is a proposal for gnome-bluetooth to be integrated in the Desktop
> release for GNOME 2.28
>
>
>
I rarely write something here, but I feel the need to write some words :).
I vote for this great application whic
Heya,
This is a proposal for gnome-bluetooth to be integrated in the Desktop
release for GNOME 2.28
Purpose: Device management for Bluetooth devices
Target: Desktop (Linux-only)
Dependencies: to achieve a full feature set: nautilus-sendto, BlueZ 4.34
(plus a few patches), obex-data-server, gvfs o
18 matches
Mail list logo
