On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 17:08 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 23:58 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
> > On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 15:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > > Any rdf:resource should always be a URL. An email address
> > > is not a URL. The correct thing to do is to use a
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 23:58 +0200, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 15:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > Any rdf:resource should always be a URL. An email address
> > is not a URL. The correct thing to do is to use a mailto:
> > URL.
> >
> > The fact that Pulse didn't have mailto
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 15:46 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> Any rdf:resource should always be a URL. An email address
> is not a URL. The correct thing to do is to use a mailto:
> URL.
>
> The fact that Pulse didn't have mailto: in its templates
> and that we put bogus info on live.gnome.org just
On Sat, 2009-04-25 at 21:35 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've just tried to add a doap to netspeed. However pushing failed.
>
> ---
> ERROR: netspeed.doap is not valid:
>Invalid foaf:mbox property should be a mailto: URL
>
> Please see:
>http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner
Hi,
My understanding is that for updating a gnome website I need to
checkout the gnomeweb-wml module.
However a clone of this module is about 500MB. Cloning such a repo on
a slow internet connection takes quite some time.
Isn't there a handier way to do this?
Thanks
Jaap
___
Hi,
I've just tried to add a doap to netspeed. However pushing failed.
---
ERROR: netspeed.doap is not valid:
Invalid foaf:mbox property should be a mailto: URL
Please see:
http://live.gnome.org/MaintainersCorner#maintainers
---
error: hooks/pre-receive exited with error code 1
If you go
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Simos Xenitellis
wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Felipe Contreras
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Tim-Philipp Müller wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 12:09 +0200, Jaap
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Christophe Fergeau wrote:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> 2009/4/22 Vincent Untz
>>
>> - When committing code on behalf of others use the --author option, e.g.
>> git commit -a --author "Joe Coder " and --signoff.
>>
>> ===
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:35 AM, Sam Thursfield wrote:
> Hello!
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 6:36 PM, Cody Russell wrote:
>> No, but the point is that if you edit some code and someone else has
>> made changes to some code elsewhere in the repo, and you merge their
>> work into yours.. then maybe yo
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:57 AM, Stefan Kost wrote:
> Tristan Van Berkom schrieb:
>> You always post ChangeLogs diffs with large patches, large patches
>> generally come to the maintainer in the form of a patch, with a single
>> changelog entry, the maintainer reviewing a branch doesnt want to
>>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:26 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:19 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
> [...]
>>
>> Dude, we have moved to git and you are still talking of versioned
>> ChangeLog and favoring large patches?
>
> With a tool like git, you should be at least
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 1:17 PM, Felipe Contreras
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Tim-Philipp Müller wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 12:09 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
>>>
I think gst-ffmpeg uses this feature. g
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 04/20/2009 02:34 AM, Steve Frécinaux wrote:
>>
>> Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>>>
>>> The idea is that .gitignore files are autogenerated and are NOT stored
>>> in the repository. To use, just copy git.mk into your toplevel, add it
>>> to git
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:27 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Tim-Philipp Müller wrote:
>> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 12:09 +0200, Jaap A. Haitsma wrote:
>>
>>> I think gst-ffmpeg uses this feature. gst-ffmpeg is in git while it
>>> uses ffmpeg which is in svn.
>>
>>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 7:09 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:45 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>> On Wed, 2009-04-22 at 16:46 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> > Don't use a trailing period either.
>>
>> I find this really odd and rather arbitrary. I think it's something to
>> do wit
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:10 PM, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> Another option I like to document if we can agree on is prefixing the
> short-summary with a tag, like for example:
>
> "[layout] Improve X or Y"
>
> Others suggested:
>
> "layout: Improve X or Y"
>
> I prefer the former as it's visually
16 matches
Mail list logo
