Hi,
Le mercredi 06 mai 2009, à 20:22 +0300, Xan Lopez a écrit :
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 7:58 PM, Joanmarie Diggs
joanmarie.di...@gmail.com wrote:
Right now, my answer is gosh, I sure hope so. :-) Admittedly, not as
good as a heck yes!, but better than no.
Where things stand as of today
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 12:39:33PM +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
[..snip..]
Most of these aren't from krb5-auth-dialog itself. They were extracted
from com_err .et files of MIT Kerberos itself to make them translatable.
Restricting
(CC'ing gnome-i18n as this is mostly about translations.)
Also see http://l10n.gnome.org/module/krb5-auth-dialog/ .
Hi,
Am Montag, den 15.06.2009, 10:38 +0200 schrieb Guido Günther:
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 09:13:31PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
Restricting the extraction to
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:53 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
In any case let's try to do our best here, and in a few more weeks I'm
sure we'll have a clearer picture of where we'll stand by 2.28.
So a few more weeks have passed. Do we have a clearer picture? :-)
Looking at the NEWS file
Le lundi 15 juin 2009, à 14:44 -0400, Joanmarie Diggs a écrit :
On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 09:53 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
[...]
In any case let's try to do our best here, and in a few more weeks I'm
sure we'll have a clearer picture of where we'll stand by 2.28.
So a few more weeks
