[Freeze break request] gtksourceview crash

2009-09-19 Thread Paolo Borelli
Hi, I'd like to apply the small patchset attached to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595450 The fix is straightforward, it affects a new api added in this development cycle that was not tested under all conditions, preventing a crash and ugly empty tooltips when no tooltip for

[Freeze break request] gnome-system-tools broken user creation

2009-09-19 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Hi! I've just realized by performing some more tests that a subtly mistaken commit from August 31st had introduced a random failure to create users. Basically, we are checking that an UID is free by comparing all UIDs to an uninitialized uid_t, which obviously won't work. Sometimes, you cannot cre

Re: [Freeze break request] gnome-system-tools broken user creation

2009-09-19 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi Milan, Am Samstag, den 19.09.2009, 14:02 +0200 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat: > The fix I've committed to master is a one-liner with a very low risk > since it only changes the "uid" variable to "user_uid", since it's what > was intended. http://git.gnome.org/cgit/gnome-system-tools/tree/src/use

Re: New module proposal: tracker

2009-09-19 Thread Andre Klapper
Hi Matthew, Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2009, 17:05 +0100 schrieb Matthew Garrett: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 05:02:56PM +0100, Rob Taylor wrote: > > So we discussed this at the kernel-fixing-bof at GCDS. IIRC we basically > > decided that being able to have a recursive inotify with a new flag was > > t

Bump libunique minimum version (was: Libunique don't respect gtk+ single include)

2009-09-19 Thread Matthew Barnes
On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:21 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > This for libunique 1.0.8, released on mar 22. The issue was fixed on git > > master (at least it seems reading the log), but was never released. > > yes. I need to do a 1.1 release of libunique, which also fixes other > issues, and then

Re: Bump libunique minimum version (was: Libunique don't respect gtk+ single include)

2009-09-19 Thread Lucas Rocha
Hey, 2009/9/19 Matthew Barnes : > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 10:21 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: >> > This for libunique 1.0.8, released on mar 22. The issue was fixed on git >> > master (at least it seems reading the log), but was never released. >> >> yes. I need to do a 1.1 release of libunique, whi

Re: Danger: older bugs are getting squashed with NEEDINFO

2009-09-19 Thread Owen Taylor
On Sat, 2009-09-19 at 10:42 +1000, Danielle Madeley wrote: > On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 14:28 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: > > > I think for most modules, confirming bugs has usually seemed like a > > waste of of the maintainer's time. Confirming bugs assumes that the > > maintainer isn't looking at bugs