On Tue, 2009-08-18 at 13:05 +0100, Martyn Russell wrote:
Hi all,
So we recently polled the tracker mailing list to make sure the core
developers and others interested had an opinion on GNOME module
inclusion for Tracker. You can see the thread here:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 00:20 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 00:08 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Montag, den 12.10.2009, 17:35 +0200 schrieb Krzesimir Nowak:
I'm a maintainer of libvtemm and I'd like to propose it to be a part of
GNOME.
Libraries don't belong in
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 20:04 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some
time to get some real world testing before putting it into the
release. Do you guys have objection to that?
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't tracker 0.7 being
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see regular (weekly) releases at
ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/tracker/0.7/ I don't see an issue
at all with regard to that point.
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:27 +0100, John Stowers wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't tracker 0.7 being shipped in maemo
5? That seems like a pretty significant real world test case.
Nopes. Maemo 5 comes with Tracker 0.6.95
J.A.
___
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see regular (weekly) releases at
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process should match with GNOME.
As I see
On 29/10/09 03:04, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some time
to get some real world testing before putting it into the release. Do
you guys have objection to that?
Regarding real-world testing, yes, I think you're right. We are
expecting
On 29/10/09 09:27, John Stowers wrote:
On Wed, 2009-10-28 at 20:04 -0700, Sriram Ramkrishna wrote:
I think I'm with Zeeshan here. It looks like you should have some
time to get some real world testing before putting it into the
release. Do you guys have objection to that?
Correct me if I am
On 29/10/09 11:08, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 29.10.2009, 11:57 +0100 schrieb Murray Cumming:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:44 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 28.10.2009, 20:04 -0700 schrieb Sriram Ramkrishna:
So the current barriers I see is:
[...]
* release process
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 28/10/09 23:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
I think assuming that a project has to be shipped by distros before it can
be in GNOME or visa versa doesn't make sense.
Distros ALWAYS ship what they want and they
seahorse-plugins has branched for 2.28 (gnome-2-28). Development
continues on master.
Cheers,
Adam
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On 29/10/09 15:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 1:05 PM, Martyn Russellmar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 28/10/09 23:23, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) wrote:
I think assuming that a project has to be shipped by distros before it can
be in GNOME or visa versa doesn't make sense.
On do, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
Working with 0.6 I've known nothing but pain (leaving aside
all the political pressure I've been facing for making my app so
dependent on Tracker) so please understand that I need some time to be
sure that 0.7 is completely different
On 29/10/09 18:20, Ruben Vermeersch wrote:
On do, 2009-10-29 at 17:21 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
From a devil's advocate point of view: this might just mean that it got
worse (though I doubt it). Zeeshan raises concerns and while you go to
great lengths to explain that it is different, there
Il giorno gio, 29/10/2009 alle 01.23 +0200, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak) ha
scritto:
IMO right now you should push on the distros
to start shipping that (e.g Ubuntu Karmic still seem to have 0.6) and
once distro and existing apps have competely moved to 0.7, all
concerned parties will have a
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
But in previous GNOME release we accepted stuff like PolicyKit or
DeviceKit or PulseAudio while not yet officially released or widely
adopted. And those stuff was needed to be installed under /usr in order
to properly work.
I believe all
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On 29/10/09 22:49, Sandy Armstrong wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Patryk Zawadzkipat...@pld-linux.org
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:51 PM, David Zeuthenda...@fubar.dk wrote:
Not to sound like an asshole
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 17:51 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
But in previous GNOME release we accepted stuff like PolicyKit or
DeviceKit or PulseAudio while not yet officially released or widely
adopted. And those stuff was needed to be
Martyn Russell :
On 29/10/09 21:51, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:25 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
But in previous GNOME release we accepted stuff like PolicyKit or
DeviceKit or PulseAudio while not yet officially released or widely
adopted. And those stuff was needed to be
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:49 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I believe all of these things are (optional) dependencies, not anything
part of the GNOME desktop proper. Except for maybe PulseAudio. Solaris,
for example, don't use any of this stuff.
That's not true, we have a few Solaris people
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 19:38 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
this is all hypothetical. What matters is that people actually try it
out then make judgements based on whether the current tracker gives a
good experience. If people dont do this then the same arguments will be
made whenever tracker is
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 23:13 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 19:38 -0400, Jamie McCracken wrote:
this is all hypothetical. What matters is that people actually try it
out then make judgements based on whether the current tracker gives a
good experience. If people dont do
23 matches
Mail list logo
