On 14 Nov 2009, at 09:58, Andrew Cowie wrote:
So anyone care to put a stake in the ground about what is correct?
Well, the HIG advice hasn't really changed over the years:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/hig-book/stable/windows-primary.html.en#primary-window-titles
However, just when it's all
On 10 Nov 2009, at 17:18, Bastien Nocera wrote:
It was posted to d-d-l, and Andreas blogged about it on Planet. I'm not
sure what else we can do.
This, for example...
http://blogs.gnome.org/calum/2009/08/25/planning-for-change/
Cheeri,
Calum.
--
CALUM BENSON, Interaction Designer Sun
Hi Calum,
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Calum Benson calum.ben...@sun.com wrote:
On 14 Nov 2009, at 09:58, Andrew Cowie wrote:
So anyone care to put a stake in the ground about what is correct?
Well, the HIG advice hasn't really changed over the years:
On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 18:27 +, Calum Benson quotes from HIG:
If you plan to include your application's name in the title of a
primary window...
Since I wrote my first message, I've come to realize that the *only*
windows on the desktop that _don't_ have applications in the title are
_some_
We will have an application menu at the top of the screen that will
serve the purpose of identifying the application.
Huh.
A what?
Is this like the Global Menu (that works great, incidentally) that was
just rejected by release-team GNOME since it wasn't compatible with
GNOME Shell?
