2009/12/8 Vincent Untz :
> So let's do it another way. I think you plan to release PackageKit 0.6
> in the next few weeks? If yes, I would think we can already pre-approve
> all PackageKit bumps until 0.6.0 ;-)
Excellent, thanks.
Richard.
___
desktop-de
Le mardi 08 décembre 2009, à 11:21 +, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> 2009/12/8 Vincent Untz :
> > In 2.28.x or 2.29.x?
>
> Just 2.29, 2.28 will continue to work with really old versions of
> PackageKit (although important bugs are fixed if you use newer
> versions)
So let's do it another way. I t
2009/12/8 Vincent Untz :
> In 2.28.x or 2.29.x?
Just 2.29, 2.28 will continue to work with really old versions of
PackageKit (although important bugs are fixed if you use newer
versions)
>> PackageKit 0.5.5 was released yesterday, and is part of the
>> PACKAGEKIT_0_5_x series. Distros should have
Le mardi 08 décembre 2009, à 10:44 +, Richard Hughes a écrit :
> To fix some bugs, I've raised the gnome-packagekit dep on PackageKit
> to 0.5.5. I'm asking for retrospective permission to do so as I've
> been poked by a couple of people now.
In 2.28.x or 2.29.x?
> PackageKit 0.5.5 was releas
To fix some bugs, I've raised the gnome-packagekit dep on PackageKit
to 0.5.5. I'm asking for retrospective permission to do so as I've
been poked by a couple of people now.
PackageKit 0.5.5 was released yesterday, and is part of the
PACKAGEKIT_0_5_x series. Distros should have no real reason not
