On 01/04/2010 12:53 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
> with GCOV [1]
> You can take a look to the GnomeGoal page here: [2] (There are also
> examples to add GCOV support to json-glib and libgdata)
I was a huge fan of adding
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 03:38 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 01/04/2010 12:53 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
> > with GCOV [1]
> > You can take a look to the GnomeGoal page here: [2] (There are also
> > examples to
On 01/12/2010 03:44 AM, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 03:38 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
>> On 01/04/2010 12:53 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage of your code
>>> with GCOV [1]
>>> You can take a look to the GnomeGoa
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 03:52 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 03:44 AM, Philip Withnall wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 03:38 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
> >> On 01/04/2010 12:53 PM, Javier Jardón wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> The objective of the GnomeGoal is to add code coverage
Hello, fans of desktops and system tools!
The upcoming GNOME System Tools and liboobs 2.29.2 depend on the System
Tools Backends 2.9.0 now, which are being developed almost as a part of
GNOME since we are the only client application.
OK to raise the dependency on the wiki? I'd also need somebody
Am Dienstag, den 12.01.2010, 12:13 +0100 schrieb Milan Bouchet-Valat:
> OK to raise the dependency on the wiki? I'd also need somebody to update
> the jhbuild modulesets.
I don't see any reasons against, especially after you've listed the
issues with the current version.
> By the way, may I get t
Hi everyone,
just a quick reminder about deprecation flags and tarball release :
please avoid at all cost to hardcode deprecation flags in compilation
flags, when a module is built from a tarball (it is ok to have such
flags when building from gi checkout).
Why, you may ask ?
Well, I'm curre
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 00:19 +0100, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Johannes Schmid wrote:
>
> > Am Montag, den 11.01.2010, 11:54 +0100 schrieb Frederic Crozat:
> > > (Sorry for the delay in sending this email)
> >
> > This is really becoming a running gag ;)
>
> Actually this is an elaborate scheme to
Hi ppl
I request permission to bump the required libxklavier version to 5.0
on wiki page. The library API was changed to facilitate latest changes
in gnome-settings-daemon and gnome-applets - i.e. phasing out of the
indicator applet, and using notification icon (implemented in g-s-d
keyboard plugi
Steve:
As already discussed with Brian Cameron and David Flanders, there is a
great opportunity to hook up this event with the JISC Dev8D developer
event that is happening in London at the same time.
http://www.dev8d.org
Yes, it does seem like there is a real opportunity for some good
synerg
I hate to force open an old topic, but this recently came up as an
Ubuntu launchpad bug for their Paper Cuts project. [1]
The essence of the problem is that while Ctrl-Tab is reserved by GTK for
keyboard navigation, it has also been claimed by many popular
applications on Windows, Mac, and Li
On Tue, 2010-01-12 at 18:04 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> > Actually this is an elaborate scheme to promote the ical file and get
> > maintainers to release tarballs without any emails from the release
> > team.
> >
> > http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable/schedule.ics : subscribe to it!
>
> web
Hi Jud,
Thanks for bringing this up.
How about: those who care come up with a replacement combination for focus
navigation in GTK+, and a patch to implement ctrl+tab to change tabs, and
submit that for upstream inclusion and see if we get any substantial (other
than "breaks back-compat")?
Person
13 matches
Mail list logo
