Re: GNOME Showstopper Review; 2.30 and 3.0

2010-03-15 Thread Martyn Russell
On 14/03/10 13:33, Andre Klapper wrote: Hi, GNOME 2.30.0 will be released on March 29th. See http://live.gnome.org/Schedule . Better late than never a quick list of potential GNOME 2.30 blockers according to Bugzilla (missing any comments - sorry, no time here). Not necessarily complete.

Re: Platform for Developer Documentation

2010-03-15 Thread Daniel Espinosa
I think GDA must be considered, as a developer platform, because Anjuta depends on it. I think other projects may can take advantage of its features to save metadata, documents, history, etc. on database engines and share with others by using central servers or so. 2010/3/8 Alberto Ruiz

How to make GNOME better for Netbooks?

2010-03-15 Thread Valent Turkovic
Hi, I'm looking how to make GNOME better for users of small screen Netbooks (7). I have numerous users with7 screen netbooks and stock GNOME is almost unusable on such a system, that is why I'm looking for some help to make the GNOME experience on such systems better. Is there any work being done

Re: GtkNotebook scrolling usability

2010-03-15 Thread Christian Dywan
Am Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:50:04 -0600 schrieb Cody Russell brats...@gnome.org: So, right now GtkNotebook allows you to change tabs by using the mouse wheel. Once I noticed this and the more I thought about it, it really seems like a terrible feature and one that may be detrimental to usability.

Re: Reminder : do NOT hardcode deprecation flags in tarball / new tarballs NEEDED

2010-03-15 Thread Luca Ferretti
Il giorno mer, 10/03/2010 alle 19.05 +0100, Frederic Crozat ha scritto: Well, I'm currently strugling with smoketesting GNOME 2.29.5 release and there are some tarballs no longer building because new G_SEAL deprecation were added in yesterday GTK+ 2.19.3 release and some modules were not

Re: GNOME Showstopper Review; 2.30 and 3.0

2010-03-15 Thread Oliver Joos
Hi! On Sunday, 14.03.2010, 14:33 +0100 Andre Klapper wrote: Better late than never a quick list of potential GNOME 2.30 blockers according to Bugzilla (missing any comments - sorry, no time here). Not necessarily complete. Feedback, updates, help are welcome. Please do speak up if there are

Libwnck signals

2010-03-15 Thread Nischal Rao
Hi, Can anybody please tell me how to handle signals for Libwnck? The documentation for Libwnck doesn't have any info on this. Thanks in advance. -- regards, Nischal E Rao PS: I am new to developing gnome based applications. ___ desktop-devel-list

Re: Libwnck signals

2010-03-15 Thread Vincent Untz
Le lundi 15 mars 2010, à 18:38 +0530, Nischal Rao a écrit : Hi, Can anybody please tell me how to handle signals for Libwnck? The documentation for Libwnck doesn't have any info on this. Can you clarify? It's just standard signals, so you should use the usual GObject mechanisms to connect to

Re: Libwnck signals

2010-03-15 Thread Nischal Rao
As I said earlier, I am new to developing gnome based applications. Essentially I needed to know how signal handling is done in gnome. Thanks for the links. It helped me... :) On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote: Le lundi 15 mars 2010, à 18:38 +0530, Nischal Rao

FWD: App maintainers: Please double check StartupNotify=true in your desktop files

2010-03-15 Thread Colin Walters
Hi, Basically, please double check that your app has StartupNotify=true in your .desktop file. If it doesn't, it's almost certainly a bug. See original posting here: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-March/133523.html ___