On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 06:46, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Thu 19 Aug 2010 13:09, Jiří Techet writes:
>
>> right now libchamplain has the version number as a part of its name,
>> e.g. libchamplain-0.7.so.
>
> If you encode a version into the name, use the stable version. If 0.7 is
> a stable series, u
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 23:59, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-19 at 22:14 +0200, Jiří Techet wrote:
>> Ah, sorry for that. However, similarly to project maintenance, the
>> MAINTAINERS file is not immutable either so maybe updating it would
>> prevent this kind of confusion ;-).
>
> cla
Le vendredi 20 août 2010 à 09:46 +0200, Patryk Zawadzki a écrit :
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Brian Cameron
> wrote:
> > If you are going to update it, why not to the latest 2.8.6?
>
> I think he means minimum version with proper support for TLS certs.
> Latest would be 2.10.1.
Yes, I'd
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 5:42 AM, Brian Cameron wrote:
> If you are going to update it, why not to the latest 2.8.6?
I think he means minimum version with proper support for TLS certs.
Latest would be 2.10.1.
--
Patryk Zawadzki
___
desktop-devel-list m
