Hi Paul,
On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 5:51 AM, Paul Cutler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're still pretty light on content for the upcoming 2.32 release.
I just added some bullets off the top of my head about basic
features Rygel's inclusion will add to GNOME. I'm not very good at
this so please feel free to
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 16:32, Jiří Techet wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 12:48, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 22:03 +0200, Jiří Techet wrote:
>>> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 06:46, Andy Wingo wrote:
>>> > On Thu 19 Aug 2010 13:09, Jiří Techet writes:
>>> >
>>> >> right now libc
Paul:
This is the last (we promise!) release of the GNOME 2.x series - let's
document the release as best we can.
Add your news here:
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/ReleaseNotes
Since many distributions ship GNOME 2.x in Long Term Supported releases,
it might make sense to continue
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:19 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
> Paul:
>
> > This is the last (we promise!) release of the GNOME 2.x series - let's
> > document the release as best we can.
> >
> > Add your news here:
> > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointThirtyone/ReleaseNotes
>
> Since many distributions s
Last 2.x release, but not last 2.32.y release? I'd assume accumulated
bugfixes would just warrant another few micro releases, as they always
have done.
However we want to handle it, I think we should be clear in the release
notes that we have a plan in place for managing releasing ongoing
supp
On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 18:36 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> However we want to handle it, I think we should be clear in the
> release
> notes that we have a plan in place for managing releasing ongoing
> support for GNOME 2.x, at least for a reasonable period of time.
> People reading our release
