Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 13:33 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 10:48 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > > if you're referring to the 2.a clause in the GPLv2, i.e.: > [snip] > > then the section is referring to the licensee, i.e. people > > redistributing the program un

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Emmanuele Bassi a écrit: > *if*, on the other hand, you want a ChangeLog because it makes your life > as a packager easier (for some unknown reason) then you should probably > ask for a Gnome Goal to add the autogeneration of the ChangeLog from the > Git commit log to every GNOME project. the pat

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 10:48 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > if you're referring to the 2.a clause in the GPLv2, i.e.: [snip] > then the section is referring to the licensee, i.e. people > redistributing the program under the terms of the license, not the > original authors of the progr

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 12:58 +0200, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: > Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 10:48 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > > then the section is referring to the licensee, i.e. people > > redistributing the program under the terms of the license, not the > > original authors of the prog

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! > Anyway, as you said, I think it would be good to add autotools stuff for > this, and have all modules ship with their git changelog, since it can > be useful to distributors and users. Why is it useful? It's duplication of information (in a strange format) that is available through git and

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Milan Bouchet-Valat
Le dimanche 03 octobre 2010 à 10:48 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi a écrit : > then the section is referring to the licensee, i.e. people > redistributing the program under the terms of the license, not the > original authors of the program itself; in this case, the Debian > developer applying distribution

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Sandy Armstrong
On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:48 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > *if*, on the other hand, you want a ChangeLog because it makes your life > as a packager easier (for some unknown reason) then you should probably > ask for a Gnome Goal to add the autogeneration of the ChangeLog from the > Git commit log to

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Sun, 2010-10-03 at 11:23 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote: > There should be no need to remind you that the GPL mandates a changelog > or something similar to be present in all source distributions. it's the NEWS file. if you're referring to the 2.a clause in the GPLv2, i.e.: """ 2. You may m

Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-03 Thread Josselin Mouette
Hi, I have noticed there are still modules that don’t ship a changelog in their tarballs, and their number has been growing ever since the migration to git. There should be no need to remind you that the GPL mandates a changelog or something similar to be present in all source distributions. It