Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-08 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! I can't really speak for translators, as I only contributed a few strings in GNOME (but I also translate software in Ubuntu, so I know Launchpad too). But I think we're going to open Pandora's box if we allow applications to be translated using different systems. There will be the «

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-08 Thread Martyn Russell
On 01/10/10 03:44, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are some places where we need to bump mnimal versions: Additionally, it seems the D-Bus version is not new enough

Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-08 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Hi! So reminder: We need to fix that BEFORE making any moduleset reorganisation! No, we are not going to let moduleset reorganization held hostage in this way. ___

Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-08 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: Hi, The release team updated the proposal to reorganize the modulesets. We discussed a first version back in June [1], and there are a few visible changes: - we added a system platform category in the platform, and we now also

Re: Please ship changelogs in your tarballs

2010-10-08 Thread Dodji Seketeli
Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org a écrit: [...] Hrm, in 90% of the cases where I need information about why changes were made, I need git blame/cvs annotate style output, and a ChangeLog cannot give me this information. (Also, the tools to filter ChangeLogs suck, or are there equivalents to

Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-08 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Hi! So reminder: We need to fix that BEFORE making any moduleset reorganisation! No, we are not going to let moduleset reorganization held hostage in this way. Do you mean we will release GNOME 3.0 without

Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-08 Thread Michael Terry
On 8 October 2010 03:13, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: The best solution IMHO would be to import PO files for all applications, and integrate them into Damned Lies. Else, we're taking the risk of losing consistency, and « moduleset » won't mean anything in the end. I am afraid that

Re: Moduleset Reorganization -- Take two

2010-10-08 Thread Kjartan Maraas
fr., 08.10.2010 kl. 13.35 +0200, skrev Johannes Schmid: Hi! On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 3:13 AM, Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de wrote: Hi! So reminder: We need to fix that BEFORE making any moduleset reorganisation! No, we are not going to let moduleset reorganization held

Re: JSON-Glib (was: New module proposal: Clutter core)

2010-10-08 Thread Ted Gould
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 12:50 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: • JSON-GLib (which should be added to the external dependencies) Just to be curious, why not propose JSON-Glib. It seems with all of the Javascript going into GNOME 3 it would make sense to have a blessed way to read JSON would be a