2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel :
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> > As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
>> > everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
>> > outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comforta
On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 22:23 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-12 at 20:49 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> accounts-service has a field for e-mails, for the rest, libfolks could
> offer a similar information about the rest of the accounts, though you'd
> still end up depending on e-d-s
Le vendredi 15 octobre 2010 à 13:29 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo a
écrit :
> El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió:
> >
> > I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already
> > hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to
> > GN
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 13:29 -0500, Diego Escalante Urrelo wrote:
> El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió:
> >
> > I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already
> > hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to
> > GNOME infrast
El vie, 15-10-2010 a las 08:29 -0700, Sandy Armstrong escribió:
>
> I'm not a fan myself, but I can see how once a project was already
> hooked on a Launchpad-oriented process, it would be work to migrate to
> GNOME infrastructure.
>
Agree, how could we shorten that difference? I think this is t
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 11:33 -0400, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 17:21 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > > System Platform
> > > ===
> > >
> > > The System Platform is the set of libraries or dbus services that ar
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 17:21 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> > System Platform
> > ===
> >
> > The System Platform is the set of libraries or dbus services that are
> > used in GNOME, but are modules belonging to lower parts of the
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 8:02 AM, daniel g. siegel wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> > As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
>> > everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
>> > outside of git.gnome.or
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
>> System Platform
>> ===
>>
>> The System Platform is the set of libraries or dbus services that are
>> used in GNOME, but are modules belonging to lower parts of the stack
On Thu, 2010-10-07 at 13:38 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
> System Platform
> ===
>
> The System Platform is the set of libraries or dbus services that are
> used in GNOME, but are modules belonging to lower parts of the stack.
> We
> encourage their use for GNOME applications.
>
> This
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
> > everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
> > outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comfortable with raw
> > commits to their VC
Hi!
> > And many
> > of these modules have very little to do with each other and very
> > little reason to be forced into the same schedule.
>
> Can you give us a list of actual modules that will no longer be on the
> release schedule, please? That would help me judge the actual effect.
I don't
Hi!
> As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve
> everything with a single shot. :-) Maintainers of GNOME modules hosted
> outside of git.gnome.org don't always feel comfortable with raw
> commits to their VCS (security, noise in the vcs history etc). Whether
> translations sho
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Shaun McCance wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:59 +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>> >> Starting from 1.0, Transifex no longer forces commits to VCS. Yay. :-)
>> >
>> > We want forced commits! We don't wan
On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 12:59 +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> >> Starting from 1.0, Transifex no longer forces commits to VCS. Yay. :-)
> >
> > We want forced commits! We don't want people to care about translations
> > unless they are trans
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
>> Starting from 1.0, Transifex no longer forces commits to VCS. Yay. :-)
>
> We want forced commits! We don't want people to care about translations
> unless they are translators because we found out in the past that some
> won't care.
>
>
Hi!
> Starting from 1.0, Transifex no longer forces commits to VCS. Yay. :-)
We want forced commits! We don't want people to care about translations
unless they are translators because we found out in the past that some
won't care.
If the maintainer has to commit translations manually - that's a
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Johannes Schmid wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> I suspect a GNOME instance of Transifex will solve this, as long as
>> the upstream maintainer chooses to use GTP instead of another
>> translation community. What are our main problems for projects not
>> hosted on GNOME servers?
Le jeudi 14 octobre 2010, à 15:38 +0200, Jan de Groot a écrit :
> On Wed, 2010-10-13 at 17:50 -0300, Jonh Wendell wrote:
> > Hi, folks.
> >
> > Will we have a gnome-panel ported to gtk3? We need it for gnome 3 as
> > fallback for gnome-shell, right?
It will eventually, yes. Help welcome, etc. Not
Hi!
> I suspect a GNOME instance of Transifex will solve this, as long as
> the upstream maintainer chooses to use GTP instead of another
> translation community. What are our main problems for projects not
> hosted on GNOME servers?
The main problem is that external projects often don't allow
tr
2010/10/12 Claude Paroz :
> Sorry, I was away for some days and wasn't able to give my opinion
> sooner.
>
> First of all, I'd like to support that using the GNOME infrastructure is
> invaluable for translators. It is not rare for us to commit in modules,
> (POTFILES.in, translator comments, other
On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Kenneth Nielsen wrote:
> 2010/10/12 Johannes Schmid :
>> After some thinking transiflex really looks like a nice solution. I
>> mean, damned-lies is cool but it adds a lot of maintaince work (for
>> Claude).
>>
>> Could we install our own transiflex instance on ou
2010/10/12 Gabor Kelemen :
> 2010-10-12 17:41 keltezéssel, Gil Forcada írta:
>>
>> Then l10n.gnome.org should make commits in the git.gnome.org version and
>> the maintainer should only had to pick the translations from there.
>>
>>
>
> No, please do not want to rely on "then the maintaner will com
2010/10/12 Johannes Schmid :
> Hi!
>
> Am Dienstag, den 12.10.2010, 18:30 + schrieb Og Maciel:
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Kenneth Nielsen
>> wrote:
>> > Implementable workflow (3). (A) again is status quo, not much to say
>> > about that. Transifex (C) (afaik*) workflow revolves aro
24 matches
Mail list logo
