Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/16 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org: On Sat, 2010-10-16 at 03:05 +0200, Kenneth Nielsen wrote: 2010/10/15 daniel g. siegel dgsie...@gnome.org: On Fri, 2010-10-15 at 16:47 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: Hi! As much as I'd like to claim it, I don't think we can achieve

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
Hallo everyone I think this thread is about reaching the length where we need to make something happen, or nothing will come of it and we are all doomed to repeat the whole thing the next time this issue arises. So lets try and sum up: The solution of having a translations only copy of a module

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Johannes Schmid
Hi! Then we can afterwards continue discussing whether we should/need to add an offer for a external translation framework that is also GNOME approved (e.g. Transifex, Launchpad ,). Note that Transifex is not an *external* solution as we would host our own Transifex service on GNOME

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Kenneth Nielsen
2010/10/18 Johannes Schmid j...@jsschmid.de: Hi! Then we can afterwards continue discussing whether we should/need to add an offer for a external translation framework that is also GNOME approved (e.g. Transifex, Launchpad ,). Note that Transifex is not an *external* solution as we

Re: Help make this document complete (default GNOME keyboard shortcuts on wiki)

2010-10-18 Thread Andre Klapper
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 23:56 +0200 schrieb Mark: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts It would be nice to get that list complete and accurate for _default_ GNOME shortcuts. http://library.gnome.org/users/user-guide/stable/keyboard-skills.html.en andre --

Re: libnotify, gtk changes

2010-10-18 Thread Guillaume Desmottes
Le samedi 16 octobre 2010 à 23:01 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit : Hey, some 2.91.1 API change updates... Jon did a libnotify 0.7 release, which brings a number of API changes to make notifications work better in gnome-shell. Thankfully, Jon also provided patches for everything in our

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Dimitris Glezos
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com wrote: The solution of having a translations only copy of a module in gnome git, combined with some sort of automatic syncing back and forth, seems to a good solution for the module maintainers that don't mind having this

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Shaun McCance
On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 18:11 +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote: Now, having said this, I just realized a potential issue with Tx GNOME. Tx 1.0 does NOT support intltool projects which do not have a POT file. More information at the following pages:

Re: libnotify, gtk changes

2010-10-18 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 04:23:42PM +0200, Guillaume Desmottes wrote: According to http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointNinetyone/ExternalDependencies GNOME 2.91 still depends on libnotify 0.4.5. If 0.7 has been approved, the wiki and jhbuild moduleset should be updated. Updated. -- Regards,

Re: GNOME Moduleset Reorganization vs. L10N

2010-10-18 Thread Dimitris Glezos
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-18 at 18:11 +0300, Dimitris Glezos wrote: Now, having said this, I just realized a potential issue with Tx GNOME. Tx 1.0 does NOT support intltool projects which do not have a POT file. More information at

G/tkApplication

2010-10-18 Thread Ryan Lortie
Hi, While I wasn't looking, Cody Russell gained access to my laptop and pushed the GApplication branch to glib master. He admits to it, even: http://twitter.com/bratschegnome/status/27779385082 Shortly afterward he redeemed himself (and fixed the GTK build) by pushing the new