On 19 October 2010 00:44, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
The upshot, though, is probably that quite some application that were
making use of the old GApplication have stopped working.
So... what versions of gtk+ and glib should GNOME 2.91.1 tarballs be
targeted against?
Can I just skip
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 10:01 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 19 October 2010 00:44, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
The upshot, though, is probably that quite some application that were
making use of the old GApplication have stopped working.
So... what versions of gtk+ and glib should
On 18 Oct 2010, at 12:22, Andre Klapper wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 17.10.2010, 23:56 +0200 schrieb Mark:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Table_of_keyboard_shortcuts
It would be nice to get that list complete and accurate for _default_
GNOME shortcuts.
On Tue, 2010-10-19 at 12:05 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote:
So now it's safe for us to use GApplication again :) ? Or there is any
possibility things
will change a lot during this release cycle ?
We ported Brasero on 2.31 cycle and almost at the end we had to move back to
unique (mostly copypaste
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 11:01 AM, Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 October 2010 00:44, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
The upshot, though, is probably that quite some application that were
making use of the old GApplication have stopped working.
So... what versions of gtk+
2010/10/18 Dimitris Glezos gle...@indifex.com:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Kenneth Nielsen k.nielse...@gmail.com
wrote:
The solution of having a translations only copy of a module in gnome
git, combined with some sort of automatic syncing back and forth,
seems to a good solution for the
