Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Brian Cameron
Ray/Robert: On 10/22/10 12:17 AM, Ray Strode wrote: (speaking as one of the 3 maintainers of GDM) Speaking as another... On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 12:02 AM, Robert Ancellrobert.anc...@gmail.com wrote: - The GDM greeter is slow due to it loading the GNOME session, the example GTK+ LightDM

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Robert Ancell
Thanks for the feedback Ray, I hadn't considered if GNOME recommend more than one display manager? I don't know. I'm trying to align LightDM as a freedesktop.org project closely related to the X server (and thus an external dependency) with a GNOME greeter developed as a full GNOME project. For

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Josselin Mouette
Le vendredi 22 octobre 2010 à 01:17 -0400, Ray Strode a écrit : Using GNOME session / g-s-d /etc is one of GDMs main features. The point is for there to be consistent experience on the login screen and in the session. That, I fully agree with. This is a major feature of GDM, that makes

Re: (not) proposing Snowy for GNOME 3.0

2010-10-22 Thread Rodrigo Moya
On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:35 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: == GNOME Web Platform == There is no GNOME web platform. There are no new libraries being proposed for use by all GNOME web modules. It feels way too early to try to make those sorts of decisions. We need another module or two

Re: (not) proposing Snowy for GNOME 3.0

2010-10-22 Thread Sandy Armstrong
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodr...@gnome-db.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:35 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: == GNOME Web Platform == There is no GNOME web platform.  There are no new libraries being proposed for use by all GNOME web modules.  It feels way too early

Re: (not) proposing Snowy for GNOME 3.0

2010-10-22 Thread Maciej Piechotka
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 12:27 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: On Thu, 2010-10-21 at 21:35 -0700, Sandy Armstrong wrote: == GNOME Web Platform == There is no GNOME web platform. There are no new libraries being proposed for use by all GNOME web modules. It feels way too early to try to

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:11 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 22:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are some places where we need to bump

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-22 Thread Frederic Peters
Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:11 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 22:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped the recommended versions to current versions in many places. There are some

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-22 Thread Frederic Peters
{sorry I didn't notice this before my previous message} Bastien Nocera wrote: We'll probably also need to add libsocialweb. nautilus-sendto for GNOME3 will depend on it, as well as the Web Accounts panel for the control-center. I've done a tarball release and added libsocialweb to

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 15:08 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: {sorry I didn't notice this before my previous message} Bastien Nocera wrote: We'll probably also need to add libsocialweb. nautilus-sendto for GNOME3 will depend on it, as well as the Web Accounts panel for the

Re: external dependency review for 2.91

2010-10-22 Thread Bastien Nocera
On Fri, 2010-10-22 at 14:53 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote: Bastien Nocera wrote: On Mon, 2010-10-04 at 11:11 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 22:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: Hi, I looked over the external dependencies for 2.91 [1]. I've bumped the recommended

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 5:31 AM, Josselin Mouette j...@debian.org wrote: Le vendredi 22 octobre 2010 à 01:17 -0400, Ray Strode a écrit : Using GNOME session / g-s-d /etc  is one of GDMs main features.  The point is for there to be consistent experience on the login screen and in the

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:11 AM, Brian Cameron brian.came...@oracle.com wrote: I agree that GDM's deep integration with GNOME is one of its great features.  GDM is clearly the login manager of choice if you want a very consistent experience between the login manager and the GNOME desktop.

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Ray Strode
Hi, On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 2:50 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com wrote: While I appreciate the use of a full session for the greeter has it's advantages, I'm not sure they're all necessary for the limited GUI required in a greeter. It's not necessary (i mean there's a lot of prior

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Brian Cameron
Ray: On 10/22/10 09:50 AM, Ray Strode wrote: However, not everyone really needs or wants the degree of integration that GDM provides with GNOME. I feel like GNOME should be catering to GNOME's users, and we're doing a disservice to them if we don't provide integration. Agreed, and I agree

Call for a new Conglomerate maintainer!

2010-10-22 Thread Mario Blättermann
Hi all, in my opinion, Conglomerate is the best XML editor ever. but the last release was five years ago. In the meantime, Conglomerate was able to keep its users alive, but the application itself seems to rest in peace...A lot of new or completed translations have arrived. The user

Re: New module proposal: LightDM

2010-10-22 Thread Robert Ancell
I also want to say something slightly off-topic regarding impulse to change.  A lot of users hate when things they use get changed.  It screws up their workflows, etc, and so many changes are controversial.  Often there's a gut reaction can you provide a way for me get things back to the old