On 02/08/2011 02:39 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> seahorse-plugins:
> "Port to latest gtk+3 (2.99.2)" --
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639493 (trivial patch)
> "seahorse-plugins doesn't build with libnotify 0.7" --
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632800 (trivial patch)
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
>> Will there be a gtk2 version of libpanel-applet-3 when GNOME 3.0 is
>> released?
>
> There is libpanel-applet-4 for the fallback mode in GNOME 3. There's no
> plan to have a gtk2 version of it, at the moment. It's certainly doable,
> though, b
Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 00:04 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 00:09 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sandy Armstrong wrote:
> > > As Johannes said in his email, bugzilla is the right venue.
> >
> > In defense of Sebastien, he has been proposing mock-ups, and no
Le jeudi 10 février 2011 à 09:42 +, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:56 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> >
> > Dave Neary wrote:
> > > In defense of Sebastien, he has been proposing mock-ups, and no
> > > developers have been commenting on them there.
> >
> > ...where by "develop
A small change that will make a big difference is to replace
Exec=gnote
with
Exec=gnote --search
in the desktop file. As things are right now, I always have to 'start'
gnote twice to get any ui I can interact with...
___
desktop-devel-list mailing lis
Hi,
I agree (as is clear in the report) that the design is coming at the problem in
the wrong way. It seems to be the old style "there are lots of useful features
available in the back-end tools, we should have an UI for them" school of
thought. But that's not the point.
The point is that when
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 08:56 +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
>
> Dave Neary wrote:
> > In defense of Sebastien, he has been proposing mock-ups, and no
> > developers have been commenting on them there.
>
> ...where by "developers" I mean "designers".
I don't think one needs to be a designer to see that
