Lennart Poettering [2011-05-16 19:33 +0200]:
Well, I think the different smaller system settings we want to make
configurable, like the system locale, or the hostname or the timezone
probably all need a tiny bit of intelligence on the server side, in
order to ensure compat and provide change
On 05/16/2011 01:42 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 12:44 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/14/2011 11:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
The fact that we have only one implementation means that we have one
well maintained implementation. I don't think it's much of a problem. Do
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Frederik Gladhorn gladh...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
sorry for cross-posting. I would just like to have this looked at by everyone
so we can simply implement it.
During the ATK/AT-SPI hackfest it came up a few times that we have no solution
to enable accessibility
Hey
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:03 PM, Will Thompson
will.thomp...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
Ah! My suggestion was, concretely: rather than
method GetGoogleToken() → s
method GetFacebookToken() → s
method GetOAuthToken() → s
GOA could have either an API which resembles SASL, or…
[...]
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 9:39 AM, David Zeuthen zeut...@gmail.com wrote:
OTOH, if calculating the SASL response involves e.g. private API keys
like it does for calculating the IMAP SASL response, see
http://code.google.com/apis/gmail/oauth/protocol.html
then... then I think GOA _will
On 14 May 2011 00:32, Michael Terry m...@mterry.name wrote:
Hrm. I do have a need to clean up the jhbuild sets. I also know that
older modulesets should be pointing at the branches of DD, not trunk.
I will fix that soon.
Just FYI, I fixed up the modulesets. Now librsync is built for
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 09:21 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/16/2011 01:42 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Sun, 2011-05-15 at 12:44 +0300, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
On 05/14/2011 11:24 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
The fact that we have only one implementation means that we have one
well
On Mon, 2011-05-16 at 09:37 -0500, Ted Gould wrote:
On Sat, 2011-05-14 at 21:24 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
On Wed, 2011-05-11 at 10:20 +0200, Ted Gould wrote:
On Mon, 2011-05-09 at 16:52 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
This library should be used in place of Geoclue's D-Bus API for
Ray:
On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Brian Cameronbrian.came...@oracle.com wrote:
Yes, you are right. GDM does not currently use OpenGL.
My comment was meant to be understood as an example of how GDM may be
moving in a direction that requires certain hardware or only works on
certain
Hey Lennart,
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Lennart Poettering mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
I think the right place for tiny mini-daemons like that is probably
systemd.
I completely agree - it's nice that we finally have a place to do
this. And it's nice that you are using D-Bus properties to
Matthew:
I'd expect that a prerequisite for adoption would be functional
equivalence. If the greeter is to be maintained by some third party
rather than yourself, how is the maintenance overhead reduced over using
gdm?
When GDM was rewritten, functional equivalence and configuration
On Tue, 17.05.11 12:36, David Zeuthen (zeut...@gmail.com) wrote:
However, when you emit the PropertiesChanged signal on the
org.fd.DBus.Properties interface, you could pretty please include the
value for the property that changed as well [0]? The fact you
currently don't (which Bastien found
Jon:
On 05/14/11 03:37 PM, William Jon McCann wrote:
It
is certainly a serious overreaction to my statement that a proposal
that is based on an internal architecture change, that uses lines of
code as a metric, and didn't include a single thing that would improve
the user experience seems to
Hey,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 12:49 PM, Lennart Poettering
mzta...@0pointer.de wrote:
It's mostly a question of laziness on my side. The
invalidated_properties stuff I can hook up in matter of seconds. The
other props need more work.
Excellent, good to hear. Thanks!
Cheers,
David
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 11:56 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
However, GDM may not be the best display manager choice for particular
users or distros who have more stringent security requirements or who
may require reviewing or auditing of security related programs like GDM.
Hi Brian,
I think the
Shaun:
So the question here is not Does LightDM better serve
the needs of some GNOME-based operating systems? The
question is simply Should LightDM replace GDM as the
display manager for GNOME?
Perhaps I am confused, but I thought that the recent moduleset
reorganization was designed to get
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:31 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Shaun:
So the question here is not Does LightDM better serve
the needs of some GNOME-based operating systems? The
question is simply Should LightDM replace GDM as the
display manager for GNOME?
Perhaps I am confused, but I
Shaun McCance wrote:
I think that's the idea behind the Apps moduleset, but not Core.
Core is the operating system. Apps are some things we think you
might like to install on top of it.
At least, that's my understanding.
That's correct.
Fred
Shaun:
Perhaps display manager programs are special in some way that only
allows for one to be approved at a time. But I do not remember anyone
discussing any special considerations like this in this thread.
I think that's the idea behind the Apps moduleset, but not Core.
Core is the
On 17 May 2011 11:37, Fernando Herrera fherr...@onirica.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, how? I mean, currently I don't see anycode on lighDM for this. Are
you going to solve that at the distro level using some kind of script
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 04:03 +0200, Robert Ancell wrote:
On 17 May 2011 11:37, Fernando Herrera fherr...@onirica.com wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Robert Ancell robert.anc...@gmail.com
wrote:
So, how? I mean, currently I don't see anycode on lighDM for this. Are
you
On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 12:31 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote:
Shaun:
So the question here is not Does LightDM better serve
the needs of some GNOME-based operating systems? The
question is simply Should LightDM replace GDM as the
display manager for GNOME?
Perhaps I am confused, but I
22 matches
Mail list logo
