On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Federico Mena Quintero
wrote:
>
> As a way to solve these issues, I'd like to follow up on an idea which I
> sketched during last year's Desktop Summit - namely, about constructing
> a pattern language for Gnome's design based on the good things that what
> we have
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 11:17 PM, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> I'm completely and utterly against this idea, you might push away the
> noise, but you are pushing away all new contributors as well... how are you
> supposed to become a design contributor if you're not a programmer and you
> cannot contribu
On Wed, 2012-04-25 at 14:27 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> But there are challenges and things we can do better. Among those
> obstacles, I see:
>
> * lack of design resources - we are always trailing behind where we
> want to be, and there are important tasks which we are unable to
> complete (a new
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Andre Klapper wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:00 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>> One of my goals for 2012 is to increase the number of patches I'm
>> reviewing myself, and more generally, even further increase the
>> percentage of patches that go into GNOME that ha
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 13:00 -0400, Ray Strode wrote:
> I don't think the person who reviewed a patch is always critical
> information, though. Certainly, drive-by pastebin patches should be
> trivial and obvious. If the proposed changes aren't trivial and
> obvious, then they should go to bugzil
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 19:14 +0200, Andre Klapper wrote:
> While peer reviews are great, **in some projects** teams miss manpower
> already to have reviews at all, without any peer.
If one doesn't have any peers for a particular project, yes, clearly
there's no one to review. However we should be
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Emmanuel Pacaud wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to make replace the PgDown
> sequence.
PgUp/PgDown are the standard GNOME shortcuts for switching between
tabs, so I don't think removing them is a good idea. Obviously we could add
left/right as additional shortcu
On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 12:00 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> One of my goals for 2012 is to increase the number of patches I'm
> reviewing myself, and more generally, even further increase the
> percentage of patches that go into GNOME that have peer review.
Offtopic, but the obvious first step would
Hi,
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> In this scenario, I don't want to lose the critical information that the
> patch has been reviewed (and who reviewed it). So here's the proposal:
I think when the person who reviewed a patch is critical information,
then the details of
- Mensaje original -
> De: Juanjo Marín
> Para: surma ; "desktop-devel-list@gnome.org"
>
> CC:
> Enviado: Jueves 3 de Mayo de 2012 18:23
> Asunto: Re: Gnome 3 issues
>
>it is totally functional IMHO.
>
BTW, I recommend GNOME 3.4, previous versions had some issues
in my experience
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>
> Opinions?
>
It would be nice if git-bz and splinter could work together to get
Reviewed-By tags added automatically.
In general, more patch review is of course a good thing, and keeping a
better record of it is a great idea - as long as w
>Why did you screw up gnome menus?
>I've
been using gnome since 2000, and it
>has been the best desktop
available until gnome 3
>came. I had a terrible car accident 31. Dets
2005,
>which caused me to spend 6 months in coma.
>That messed up my
hands and I can't use mouse.
>That is why I liked gnome
Hi,
One of my goals for 2012 is to increase the number of patches I'm
reviewing myself, and more generally, even further increase the
percentage of patches that go into GNOME that have peer review.
git-bz and splinter make this flow fairly good, however for trivial
patches, especially when multip
Le jeudi 03 mai 2012 à 16:56 +0200, Florian Müllner a écrit :
> That messed up my hands and I can't use mouse.
> That is why I liked gnome 2, everything could be done
> without mouse.
>
> And the same is true for Gnome3 - to navigate to an application, you
> can use
> PgD
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:40 AM, surma wrote:
> That messed up my hands and I can't use mouse.
> That is why I liked gnome 2, everything could be done
> without mouse.
>
And the same is true for Gnome3 - to navigate to an application, you can use
PgDown( | | )
(or , select "Applications
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 22:41 +0200, Krzysztof Walo wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better if it looked like this:
> 1. Ask user necessary questions (language, name, time zone?)
> 2. Launch desktop session
> 3. Let user configure it
> 4. Install system
>
> 4th step would only require to setup parti
On 04/26/2012 02:27 PM, Jakub Steiner wrote:
Hi Shaun,
Hello all,
I *love* the idea of showing notifications and allowing control of
media playback. It's something I've wanted for a very, very long
time.
But I share Bhaavan's concern with having to physically drag the
screen up. It's very cu
On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 09:40 +0300, surma wrote:
> Hello,
> On to the point.
> Why did you screw up gnome menus?
> I've
> been using gnome since 2000, and it
> has been the best desktop
> available until gnome 3
> came. I had a terrible car accident 31. Dets
> 2005,
> which caused me to spend 6 mont
Hello,
On to the point.
Why did you screw up gnome menus?
I've
been using gnome since 2000, and it
has been the best desktop
available until gnome 3
came. I had a terrible car accident 31. Dets
2005,
which caused me to spend 6 months in coma.
That messed up my
hands and I can't use mouse.
That is w
Hey Maciej,
> Why use PIN at all? (Apparently that is question for Windows 8 as
> well).
> Or is it for smartcards?
PIN entry is an alternative authorization method for form factors where a
typically long text entry (especially with numerals thrown in) is too much of a
burden, like on a tablet
Hi Shaun,
> I *love* the idea of showing notifications and allowing control of
> media playback. It's something I've wanted for a very, very long
> time.
>
> But I share Bhaavan's concern with having to physically drag the
> screen up. It's very cumbersome with a mouse. And aside from being
> inc
Hello,
A little off topic, but since the move to gnome-shell
I miss an automatic slideshow when the computer is idle
(a screensaver in old terminology).
How could it be integrated with the proposed design? Would
customization of the lock screen be possible? Maybe a rotating
background with a m
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 14:08 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Sure, I agree that the online account and intro tour steps are useful
> for every new user, not just the first. Beyond that, they are also
> useful for an existing user who just upgraded his system from GNOME 2
> and is not familiar with t
Ben, Peter, and Bruce share links to interesting articles and videos and
sometimes they can't check it, like if Bruce is in a meeting or out and
about on his phone, but if his computer also kept track of the link in IM,
then he could look at it then.
So one thing is that Bruce is unavailable to lo
You know, when I first stumbled on zeitgeist running on my system a year or
so ago, I didn't know what in the world it was doing, although it appeared
to be logging... something. And I think I probably forced it to quit out of
pure habit, before going online to figure out what it was actually doing
+1 for me. I think there is some great potential for interesting features
in GNOME. I've always been a big fan of the mapping of documents on a
calendar so I know what I was working on a particular day.
As a marketing guy, I'd like us to beat our competition with unique
features that can't be se
Hey Petris,
pec...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> Since GNOME Shell 3.2 I love feature of overview accessing contacts
> database and looking up their status. However, while I understand
> reasoning to have default behaviour to just open entry in Contacts
> app, I would like to have fast acce
27 matches
Mail list logo
