Re: build.gnome.org

2013-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Colin, all, Colin Walters [2013-01-04 13:30 -0500]: > On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 17:50 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > > http://build.gnome.org/ mentions 3.6 (past), the Fedora one seems to be > > offline, and the Debian one has not been updated since October. > > There are a couple of things here

Re: build.gnome.org

2013-01-15 Thread Colin Walters
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:07 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > We have experimented with that a bit, by building > > https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%20Gnome/ Interesting! Looks quite useful. Are you doing anything with respect to the "jhbuild sysdeps --install" infrastructur

Re: Privacy/Security Friends of GNOME campaign?

2013-01-15 Thread Xiaojun Ma
On 12/13/2012 12:19 PM, Karen Sandler wrote: > Are there areas of GNOME that you think could be improved from this > perspective? Sure, what about proper L2TP support. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554046 Something raised many years ago but no progress except some buggy "third-party"

Re: Privacy/Security Friends of GNOME campaign?

2013-01-15 Thread Tristan Van Berkom
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Wed, 2012-12-12 at 23:19 -0500, Karen Sandler wrote: > >> The marketing team agreed that this time a privacy/security campaign would >> be great for a friends of GNOME drive. After Jacob Applebaum's talk at >> GUADEC, we heard a

Re: build.gnome.org

2013-01-15 Thread Martin Pitt
Hello Colin, Colin Walters [2013-01-15 15:34 -0500]: > On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 11:07 +0100, Martin Pitt wrote: > > > We have experimented with that a bit, by building > > > > https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/Raring/view/JHBuild%20Gnome/ > > Interesting! Looks quite useful. Are you doing an