On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 18:52 +0100, Allan Day wrote:
> Shaun McCance wrote:
> ...
> > RTD has been hugely popular in the Python world, but it's not the only
> > continuous deployment or automated docs build system out there. Red Hat
> > and Fedora use Publican for almost everything. ...
>
> The Re
Shaun McCance wrote:
...
> RTD has been hugely popular in the Python world, but it's not the only
> continuous deployment or automated docs build system out there. Red Hat
> and Fedora use Publican for almost everything. ...
The Red Hat Publican deployment seems fairly custom - it is pretty
nice,
> Frederic Peters wrote:
>> ... I'd prefer to have ideas on the structure we
>> want before we go looking for the appropriate software (or changes to
>> the library-web code base).
...
Thinking about this, if we are going to do something homebrew, then I
can I can come up with more detailed plans
Frederic Peters wrote:
...
>> RTD has been hugely popular in the Python world, but it's not the only
>> continuous deployment or automated docs build system out there. Red Hat
>> and Fedora use Publican for almost everything. OpenStack has a big pile
>> of Maven code that builds its site. There ar
Hi Shaun,
> How much maintenance burden is there for the general infrastructure of
> library-web, versus the burden of the various converters and such that
> we'd have to deal with anyway if plugging them into another system?
There's not much maintenance required, for example new modules are
auto
On Fri, 2014-09-05 at 11:24 +0200, Frederic Peters wrote:
> Allan Day wrote:
>
> > One of the reasons why I wanted to have this conversation is to find
> > out if there are any third party solutions that we could use, rather
> > than having to write and maintain our own site from scratch? Is Read
hi Alexandre;
you're absolutely right. just for reference to the i18n teams, the strings are:
"""
You are currently browsing incognito. Pages viewed in this
mode will not show up in your browsing history and all stored
information will be cleared when you close the window. Any files you
download
Second +1 from i18n.
Cheers
El 05/09/2014 13:21, "Alexandre Franke"
escribió:
> On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > hi all;
> >
> > I filed this bug[0] for epiphany to update the "incognito mode" string
> > to include a warning about the fact that browsing incognito won't
On Fri, Sep 5, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> hi all;
>
> I filed this bug[0] for epiphany to update the "incognito mode" string
> to include a warning about the fact that browsing incognito won't
> prevent other actors from tracking your activity. I think it's a good
> thing to notify
hi all;
I filed this bug[0] for epiphany to update the "incognito mode" string
to include a warning about the fact that browsing incognito won't
prevent other actors from tracking your activity. I think it's a good
thing to notify the users about this detail, and other browsers do the
same.
there
Allan Day wrote:
> One of the reasons why I wanted to have this conversation is to find
> out if there are any third party solutions that we could use, rather
> than having to write and maintain our own site from scratch? Is Read
> the Docs [1] an option?
It's a first look from that perspective,
Frederic Peters wrote:
...
> I would tend to put goals before technical details, but library-web as
> it is nowadays is certainly not the best option; I addressed a few of
> the issues in my mail to gnome-doc-devel-list@. ...
>> * Hackability ...
>> * User experience ...
>> * Documentation w
Jasper St. Pierre wrote:
> While I'm sure a dynamic site would be a great idea in the far future, are
> there any small, actionable goals we can make for this?
As Fred already said, this list is probably the critical priority -
https://wiki.gnome.org/DocumentationProject/Tasks/DeveloperDocs#deve
13 matches
Mail list logo
