Installing DBus interface files for services

2015-01-12 Thread Cosimo Cecchi
Hi all, I was wondering if there's any reason we typically don't install on the system DBus XML interface files for services. On my system, I can see a bunch of definitions in /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces, but it's by no means a complete list of all the services in the system. Standardizing such a

Re: Standardizing the "latest dev code" Version field value in GNOME Bugzilla?

2015-01-12 Thread Philip Withnall
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 16:43 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: > > 1) Does this variety of names create a real problem? For example, > > does it make using git-bz harder (remembering the version value, > > assuming you mostly develop against the

Re: Standardizing the "latest dev code" Version field value in GNOME Bugzilla?

2015-01-12 Thread Michael Catanzaro
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andre Klapper wrote: 1) Does this variety of names create a real problem? For example, does it make using git-bz harder (remembering the version value, assuming you mostly develop against the latest code)? Do you care / do enough people use git-bz / do people not

Re: Standardizing the "latest dev code" Version field value in GNOME Bugzilla?

2015-01-12 Thread Dimstar / Dominique Leuenberger
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 21:28 +0100, Andre Klapper wrote: > 1) Does this variety of names create a real problem? > For example, does it make using git-bz harder (remembering the version > value, assuming you mostly develop against the latest code)? > Do you care / do enough people use git-bz / do pe

Standardizing the "latest dev code" Version field value in GNOME Bugzilla?

2015-01-12 Thread Andre Klapper
Welcome GNOME community to this bikeshed! Many products in Bugzilla's {Core, Platform, Bindings, Applications} classifications have entries in the "Version" field which refer to "latest dev code, not expressed via some version number". We have 18 different names for describing that in GNOME Bugzi

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Sriram Ramkrishna
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:25:26AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote: >> Internet. The greatest way of changing minds and hearts is to be calm and >> coherent on what we're trying to do. That said, this thread and its replies >> are a perfect exam

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 08:25:26AM -0800, Sri Ramkrishna wrote: > Internet. The greatest way of changing minds and hearts is to be calm and > coherent on what we're trying to do. That said, this thread and its replies > are a perfect example of how we should approach issues. If we want to gain >

Re: elementary shutdown kills opened applications

2015-01-12 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
One idea is that you're killing the X server directly. GTK+ applications take a disconnect from the primary display as an indication that the user's session has closed, and that they should quit (actually, it's just considered an IO error, to which the response of a standard X11 application is fata

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Jasper St. Pierre
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 8:58 AM, Patrick Erdmann wrote: > (this is just a resend message from devuan list... But i would like to get > technical answers and no flamewar) > > I would like to know how you, as a GNOME Core member, think about systemd > -> Gnome and Operating Systems like the BSDs. >

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Sri Ramkrishna
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 8:02 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:50:49AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: I assume you're contacting us because you're considering GNOME for your default desktop environment. That's something that I would like to encourage. :) I also assume yo

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Olav Vitters
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 09:50:49AM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > I assume you're contacting us because you're considering GNOME for your > default desktop environment. That's something that I would like to > encourage. :) I also assume you've already willing to reimplement the > various D-Bus i

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Michael Catanzaro
Hi, I assume you're contacting us because you're considering GNOME for your default desktop environment. That's something that I would like to encourage. :) I also assume you've already willing to reimplement the various D-Bus interfaces provided by systemd, and that logind is your concern he

Re: Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Patrick Erdmann wrote: > (this is just a resend message from devuan list... But i would like to get > technical answers and no flamewar) > > I would like to know how you, as a GNOME Core member, think about systemd -> > Gnome and Operating Systems like the BSDs. S

Gnome / systemd

2015-01-12 Thread Patrick Erdmann
(this is just a resend message from devuan list... But i would like to get technical answers and no flamewar) I would like to know how you, as a GNOME Core member, think about systemd -> Gnome and Operating Systems like the BSDs. And i already asked this in IRC but what is the result you (The

Re: Taquin

2015-01-12 Thread Arnaud Bonatti
I was thinking about that, I’m notably concerned with the game not being centered, but want to enforce “the” pattern. And this one is hard to adapt in other games. Le lundi 24 novembre 2014, Michael Catanzaro a écrit : > On Sun, 2014-11-23 at 22:32 +0100, Damian Ivanov wrote: > > Hello, > > > >

Re: elementary shutdown kills opened applications

2015-01-12 Thread Carl
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Carl wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to investigate a bug [1] we have on elementary freya (which is > based on ubuntu 14.04). > Do you have an idea of a portion of the code that I should look at? Cheers, Carl. ___ deskt