Philip Withnall phi...@tecnocode.co.uk writes:
[…] given the choice between:
• a contributor giving up because Bugzilla is another account to create
and another tool to learn;
• a contributor using Bugzilla but badly, and uploading a terrible
patch which doesn’t apply cleanly; or
•
Thanks for your contribution to GNOME reads too much like a Thank you
for not smoking to me.
I usually read a CONTRIBUTING.md before I make any contributions so that
I make sure I'm doing it right. The thank you makes it out like I'm
already an active participant.
Yes, I know that's petty.
Alex
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:54 -0500, alexskc wrote:
I usually read a CONTRIBUTING.md before I make any contributions so
that
I make sure I'm doing it right.
Er good point, I seriously forgot that people might actually open the
file and see what's inside. New proposal:
The GNOME contributing
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:51 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
That said, I would like to invite anyone interested to include the
sample file above on the module/s they contribute to. If you have a
different opinion on how this should be managed, please follow up to
this thread.
I used to think that
Hey,
more than half a year has passed since the GNOME Github mirror was
setup and we are incredibly happy that it has contributed positively
to bring more contributors to the GNOME Project. While new
contributors joined the GNOME community and started contributing
through the usual workflow of
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 13:44 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm certainly cognizant of issues such as github not being FOSS,
the inconsistency with other projects hosted in GNOME, but
with the current status quo, if the choice is between don't use PRs
or don't be in GNOME infra that's likely going
On Tue, 2015-05-05 at 18:51 +0200, Andrea Veri wrote:
The GNOME contributing guidelines do require patches to be
forwarded to GNOME's Bugzilla instance hosted at
https://bugzilla.gnome.org, as such please do not open Pull Requests
(PRs) against any of the modules under the GNOME organization
