On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:37:10PM +0200, Benoit Gschwind wrote:
> Hello Drew,
>
> After reading the thread stream, I think there is two mixed questions in
> your email that is missleading. And most reply try to address both in
> one reply. I thing Daniel get the point (if I understood him well).
Hello Drew,
After reading the thread stream, I think there is two mixed questions in
your email that is missleading. And most reply try to address both in
one reply. I thing Daniel get the point (if I understood him well).
I read the two following questions:
[1] As almost all compositor will nee
As you probably know, for one reason or other, scheduling applications
have important drawbacks in GNOME right now. And after studying the
problem for a while, I came to the conclusion that the California
application is the closest to do it right now.
The only thing that it is stopping it from
Hi again,
Sorry, false alarm. :)
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Zeeshan Ali (Khattak)
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I was editting milestones of gnome-boxes product on bugzilla and I
> decided to delete the '-' milestone (which AFAIK means unknown) and
> seems I ended up deleting it for all produc
Hi everyone,
I was editting milestones of gnome-boxes product on bugzilla and I
decided to delete the '-' milestone (which AFAIK means unknown) and
seems I ended up deleting it for all products. :(
I'm terribly sorry for this but I think it's more the bugzilla
interface that's to blame here since
On 29/03/16 13:11, Drew DeVault wrote:
> I see what you're getting at now. We can get the pid of a wayland
> client, though, and from that we can look at /proc/cmdline, from which
> we can get the binary path.
This line of thinking is a trap: rummaging in /proc/$pid is not suitable
for use as a se
Hi,
On 31 March 2016 at 00:16, Drew DeVault wrote:
> Simply because xrandr was/is a poorly implemented mess doesn't mean that
> we are going to end up making a poorly implemented mess. We have the
> benefit of hindsight. After all, xorg is a poorly implemented mess but
> we still made Wayland, di
Hello everybody,
GNOME 3.20 was a busy cycle for Photos, with a lot of activity
from new contributors, and we want to carry that momentum into
3.22. While we have a roadmap [1] to list the priority bugs
and features for the near future, I want to draw your attention
to two big things that we want
