Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Diane Trout
> Rob (original co-author) wrote this recently: https://mail.gnome.org/ > archives/desktop-devel-list/2017-September/msg00047.html. It's a > very interesting read. That was an interesting read, thinking a bit out loud FWIW If you have apparmor installed on Debian, telepathy components are isolat

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 08:52:55 -0700, Diane Trout wrote: > > The general migration of user-base from open protocols (XMPP, SIP) > > to proprietary protocols with no good open-source implementation, but > > broad enough browser support that nobody has a very compelling reason > > to do the reverse-

GitLab: Status update

2017-10-18 Thread Carlos Soriano
Hello all, Another status update of the GitLab initiative. We finally created a script and applied a sync between LDAP and GitLab users. Now every GNOME member with LDAP account has now developer permission in gitlab.gnome.org, so everyone can officially start using most of the features and issue

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread David Woodhouse
On Wed, 2017-10-18 at 11:42 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote: > > Is there any interest/desire to see Google Hangouts support in > Empathy and Telepathy? Or as Telepathy is on it's way out it is no > interest? > > Or we are looking forward to use more open source friendly chat > platforms? There wa

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Diane Trout
> > Hangups seems to work pretty stably and well, and there are several > experimental matrix<->hangouts bridges out there via hangups. If > someone finished one of them off it would be a very viable option. > There's also an xmpp bridge component for hangouts based on hangups (The first versi

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Ross Burton
On 18 October 2017 at 16:52, Diane Trout wrote: > I thought the biggest reason Telepathy stalled was Nokia stopped > funding the work at Collabora after they were acquired by Microsoft, > and there weren't enough non-Collabora people involved to keep the > project healthy. > There's more than ju

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Diane Trout
> The general migration of user-base from open protocols (XMPP, SIP) > to proprietary protocols with no good open-source implementation, but > broad enough browser support that nobody has a very compelling reason > to do the reverse-engineering and write one (Hangouts, Facebook Chat) > is a large

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Matthew Hodgson
> On 18 Oct 2017, at 16:53, Adrian Perez de Castro wrote: > >> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:21:34 +0100, Simon McVittie >> wrote: >>> On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 11:42:40 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Is there any interest/desire to see Google Hangouts support in Empathy and >>> Telepathy? Or as Tel

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Adrian Perez de Castro
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 14:21:34 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 11:42:40 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote: > > Is there any interest/desire to see Google Hangouts support in Empathy and > > Telepathy? Or as Telepathy is on it's way out it is no interest? > > Telepathy can't have G

Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

2017-10-18 Thread Carlos Soriano
Don't be discouraged, the app is looking good :) I guess it's just a matter to open it to a wider world like you just did, then once things settle down a bit ask to be released it as part of GNOME. And I don't think is so far away from that, quite the opposite. Just fixing the most obvious visual

Re: Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread Simon McVittie
On Wed, 18 Oct 2017 at 11:42:40 +0300, pec...@gmail.com wrote: > Is there any interest/desire to see Google Hangouts support in Empathy and > Telepathy? Or as Telepathy is on it's way out it is no interest? Telepathy can't have Google Hangouts support unless someone reverse-engineers the protocol

Re: Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

2017-10-18 Thread Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list
Le mer. 18 oct. 2017 à 12:08, Felipe Borges a écrit : Ok, so it is a no-go. I wouldn't call it a no-go per se, it's just a bit too early to talk about inclusion when the application has no tarball published on https://download.gnome.org/ yet. ☺ More than an no-go it's more: advertise the p

Re: Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

2017-10-18 Thread Adrien Plazas via desktop-devel-list
To be fair most (all?) of the crashes I encountered where caused by running the application without installing it… which is expectable andnot the app's fault. Cheers, Adrien Plazas Le mer. 18 oct. 2017 à 12:47, Sébastien Wilmet a écrit : On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:11:02PM +0200, Felipe Borg

Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

2017-10-18 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 12:11:02PM +0200, Felipe Borges wrote: > On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > Is it really a chicken-egg dilemma? Are the crashes and bugs specific to > > some hardware or underlying software configuration? Or are the bugs > > always reproducible by

Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

2017-10-18 Thread Felipe Borges
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:47:29PM +0200, Felipe Borges wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Adrien Plazas >> wrote: >> > During my quick test I encountered many crashes. The application would >> > benefit from broader testing and

Re: Include GNOME Usage in the future releases

2017-10-18 Thread Sébastien Wilmet
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 05:47:29PM +0200, Felipe Borges wrote: > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:19 PM, Adrien Plazas > wrote: > > During my quick test I encountered many crashes. The application would > > benefit from broader testing and including it as a demo version in a GNOME > > release would clear

Google Hangouts support

2017-10-18 Thread pec...@gmail.com
Hi! Is there any interest/desire to see Google Hangouts support in Empathy and Telepathy? Or as Telepathy is on it's way out it is no interest? Or we are looking forward to use more open source friendly chat platforms? Thoughts? Respectfully, Peter. _