On Fri, 2018-02-23 at 21:40 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> If you have some issue or feature request that might impact GNOME as
> a whole and you think it's important for GNOME create an issue in our
> infra project and we can discuss if we should add it as priority for
> GNOME.
Hi,
I'm wo
Hey Milan,
This is what we do already... no? We discuss it in public and evaluate
what's important, then I try to take all this stuff into account, look at
the big picture, and come up with some specific list to GitLab upstream.
There is no subset of people in GNOME's GitLab issue tracker, you al
Hi,
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 13:21 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> There is no subset of people in GNOME's GitLab issue tracker, you all
> can comment there, that's why it's public :)
Hmm, applying the same logic you can open a GNOME's gitlab issue for
"tips of the week" and update it, instea
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 14:06 +0100, Milan Crha wrote:
> But seriously, my main point is that not every developer follows issues
> filled in GNOME infrastructure gitlab issue tracker, thus even it's a
> public place, it doesn't reach the group of people whose the decision
> will influence the most.
PD: The email is long, but I hope it clarifies how I work about the GitLab
stuff to anyone that might be in doubt about the evaluation process and how
I set priorities to issues that impact GNOME.
> Hmm, applying the same logic you can open a GNOME's gitlab issue for
"tips of the week" and update
On Wed, 2018-02-28 at 15:39 +0100, Carlos Soriano wrote:
> Hope this was useful and clarified any doubt you might have, it
> certainly took some time to write.
Hi,
thanks for the explanation. It was definitely useful for me. I agree
it's not simple to evaluate the priority. The "once per t
> I apologize, if I sounded inappropriate earlier.
No worries, it was fine. I probably wasn't clear in the past what people
need to do to discuss these priorities and it's a very valid question.
Cheers
Carlos Soriano
GNOME Board of Directors
On 28 February 2018 at 17:38, Milan Crha wrote:
> O