On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 13:27 +0100, Simon McVittie wrote:
>
> (This also prevents use of generated bindings; any method which a
> client wants to gracefully fall back from should be called using
> a generic D-Bus method invocation rather than a specific generated
> binding.)
>
>
On Fri, 08 Jun 2018 at 09:03:26 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
> this is a little heads-up that evolution-data-server 3.29.3 release
> will contain a D-Bus service version change, specifically
>org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Sources5
> changes to
>org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Sources6
>
> This
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 09:42 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> I don't *assert* that it was unnecessary... but I kind of *hope* it
> was unnecessary...
Hi,
you are right, it was unnecessary. I gave it a try (I really shouldn't
be that lazy) and the GDBus proxy doesn't panic when some method i
On Fri, 2018-06-08 at 09:03 +0200, Milan Crha wrote:
>
> If you think the D-Bus service version bump was unnecessary, then I
> will revert it. I only thought that it was cleaner, because the C API
> function will not fail due to missing D-Bus interface method (to be
> honest, I do not know what th
Hello,
this is a little heads-up that evolution-data-server 3.29.3 release
will contain a D-Bus service version change, specifically
org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Sources5
changes to
org.gnome.evolution.dataserver.Sources6
This had been done due to adding a new method to the interfa
