On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 9:28 pm, Philip Withnall
wrote:
Given that you’ve just committed to submitting MRs and waiting for
CI
to pass, rather than pushing directly to master, perhaps this rule
should be rethought?
Hm... as long as we have permission to merge the MR after CI has
passed, or
On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 15:15 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > And similar behaviour over the years where you seemed to be under
> the
> > impression that I was the only person in GNOME that felt that
> peer-
> > reviewed patches and CI-gated merge requests were a requirement.
> >
> > Until
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 7:53 pm, Bastien Nocera
wrote:
> "I need to remember not to [push commits directly to the main branch]
> for your modules, sorry"
I was trying to be sincere, not dismissive:
mcatanzaro: "I need to remember not to for your modules, sorry"
"Can hardly complain about
On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 10:06 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yesterday, after I committed the typo to Calendar, I promised to use
> merge requests from now on when committing build fixes. Previously, I
> had promised to do this only for your projects, but yesterday I
> forgot,
> and
Hi,
Yesterday, after I committed the typo to Calendar, I promised to use
merge requests from now on when committing build fixes. Previously, I
had promised to do this only for your projects, but yesterday I forgot,
and not for the first time. I understand that's frustrating. From now
on,
(I tried to send this to the release-team@ alias/mailing-list, but that
was shuttered last August, so seeing as it would be public on discourse
anyway)
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 09:31 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Hi developers,
>
> Please remember that action is required when updating your
>
On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 16:50 +, Philip Withnall wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-12 at 09:31 -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Hi developers,
> >
> > Please remember that action is required when updating your
> > dependencies
> > or build options. You need to either make sure gnome-build-meta is
>
