Re: WebKitGTK+ as an external dependency

2009-05-04 Thread Alp Toker
2009/5/4 Xan Lopez x...@gnome.org: On the accessibility camp, I am sponsored by Igalia to spend as much time as needed in the 2.28 scope (or beyond) to make WebKitGTK+ meet all the specified requirements. I've finished and merged most of Alp's pending patches mentioned in the November 2.26

Re: Proposed external dependency: WebKit/GTK+

2008-11-07 Thread Alp Toker
2008/11/6 Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: For me, one of the most important problems we face with WebKit is its lack of accessibility support right now. I have a great fear that Alp may have grossly underestimated the scope of the work. I have some confidence, however, that the WebKit folks

Re: Proposed external dependency: WebKit/GTK+

2008-11-07 Thread Alp Toker
2008/11/7 Willie Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]: It took a very long time to get accessibility support added to Gecko, and it involved a lot of collaborative work between the assistive technology and Gecko developers. There is a *lot* of testing that needs to be done to make sure the implementation

WebKit release cycle and dependency request

2008-04-16 Thread Alp Toker
You may already have heard that the WebKit/GTK+ developers have been exploring options for a release cycle. Here I'm going to outline our plans in a little more detail. WebKit/GTK+ is a community sub-project maintained mostly by GNOME and GTK+ developers. It's implemented directly on top of

Re: Online Desktop and GNOME 2.22

2007-11-21 Thread Alp Toker
John Stowers wrote: For example, the new shiny HTML5 client db stuff in webkit [2] will go some way to allowing desktop apps to be written in HTML/JS and then run inside a light webkit shell, but can we do better. What about * A simple way to start a webkit browser widget associated with a

External dependency for 2.22: managed D-Bus

2007-11-16 Thread Alp Toker
Hey, I noticed we missed managed D-Bus[0] in the list of external dependencies for 2.21. It's used pretty extensively by Tomboy which is in the core desktop module, as well as a handful of other applications like F-Spot, last-exit and Banshee. Module Version# Download --

Re: build systems

2007-11-09 Thread Alp Toker
Richard Hughes wrote: - Are the current drawbacks of using autotools in GNOME so so so annoying that it would be really worth the effort of migrating to something else? Well, I just copy and paste chunks of code in configure.ac from other projects, changing the names of constants where

Re: gnome-keyring and dbus

2007-11-02 Thread Alp Toker
Ross Burton wrote: On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 18:44 +0100, Jan de Groot wrote: since last upgrade of my arch, the gnome-keyring didn't work anymore. When launching the gnome-keyring-manager tool, it told me, that no keyring daemon was active, and the following message was shown on the console:

Re: gnome-keyring should use DBus for discovery

2007-02-13 Thread Alp Toker
Alexander Larsson wrote: On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 10:27 +, Rob Taylor wrote: Alexander Larsson wrote: I don't like using dbus-glib-1. That is an ABI unstable library that we don't want to use at this level of the stack. (It would make all gnome apps depend on an unstable library...) The way

Re: Proposal: NetworkManager for GNOME 2.18.

2006-10-08 Thread Alp Toker
Robert Love wrote: There is both a daemon and a client? Explain. The daemon is desktop-agnostic. It requires glib, HAL, and DBUS. It runs as root, at the system-level, and enforces no policy, stores no settings, and maintains no state across sessions. The client, conversely, is