way. But the implementation or change would be significant,
perhaps not even worthwhile.
But if the currently recommended terminology of "plugin" isn't being
observed or enforced, wouldn't it at least be worthwhile to change the
documentation to the preferred word? And then we could file bugs and try to
unify the terminology?
Or am I being a bit too idealistic?
Cheers,
Andrew Conkling
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496935
Rhythmbox: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496945
Tomboy: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496912
MonoDevelop: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=341845
Banshee: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=496944
Cheers,
Andrew Conkling
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
