nome.org/Apps/Usage
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-usage
> ___
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
--
Benoît Dejean
_
rocks)
Cheers
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
Hello,
I've branched libgtop.
Stable branched is gnome-2-26.
Dev happens in master.
Regards,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Bonjour,
i've branched system-monitor and libgtop for gnome-2.24.
The name of the stable branches is gnome-2-24.
Development happens in trunk.
Ciao,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de
Le lundi 07 juillet 2008 à 08:01 -0700, kamel derouiche a écrit :
Hi,,
I want to use vala for information system (uname,
kernel,..., memory status)
how I should do to use the files: sys / utsname, io.h,
poll.h
Please use libgtop-2.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org
to steal the code. i'll
answer all your technical questions.
--
Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
On 5/15/08, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
system-monitor has this using libgtop. feel free to steal the code. i'll
answer all your technical questions.
I read it but didn't get too far, I'll check again and spam you with
questions. Thanks.
Checkout this example:
http
Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 20:26 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
On 5/15/08, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going to comment about your log message instead which says:
Updated libtool versioning: API addition does not change the ABI, so
only increased
Hello,
I've branched libgtop.
The stable releases will now happen in the /branches/gnome-2-22 branch.
Developpement happens in /trunk.
Ciao,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message
Hello,
system-monitor has been branched. The stable releases will now happen
in the /branches/gnome-2-22 branch. Developement happens in /trunk.
Bye,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une
Le vendredi 30 novembre 2007 à 09:36 +, Ross Burton a écrit :
And how do i see which files are open?
ls /proc/[pid]/fd/
Simply right-click.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de
Hello,
I've branched system-monitor. The stable releases will now happen in
/branches/gnome-2-20 branch. Developpement happens in /trunk.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de
Hello,
I've branched system-monitor. The stable releases will now happen in
/branches/gnome-2-20 branch. Developpement happens in /trunk.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de
Hello,
libgtop has been branched.
The stable releases will now happen in the /branches/gnome-2-20 branch.
Developpement happens in /trunk.
Ciao,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de
Le mardi 26 juin 2007 à 10:43 +0300, Lucas Rocha a écrit :
Hi,
2007/6/26, Elijah Newren [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 6/25/07, Lucas Rocha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/6/25, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've always been around multiload_applet2. gnome-applets is a collection
. Hey chief (davyd), would you promote me ?
to do to gnome-love list
I don't think gnome-love works, there are many bugs marked HELPWANTED or
assigned to gnome-love, i've never seen any being solved by someone
coming out of the blue.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http
Le vendredi 08 juin 2007 à 08:39 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or use the new GRegex?
I think GRegex already
Le jeudi 07 juin 2007 à 13:17 -0400, Matthias Clasen a écrit :
On 6/7/07, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
or use the new GRegex?
I think GRegex already requires pcre ? I can see that glib requires pcre
7.0 to build. So what's wrong ?
It's now optionnal but enabled by default
or accepted for integration in GNOME.
So is there a room between blessed external dependencies and no external
dependencies ?
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
screensaver is also
very CPU hungry (and the drawings are not smooth at all), wasting a lot
of power.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Le dimanche 27 mai 2007 à 12:04 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le mercredi 23 mai 2007, à 21:22 +0200, Benoît Dejean a écrit :
Well, we know about the need. The point is we don't want to bless
something that doesn't do things right, because if we do so, more
projects will use
,
Great, that's exactly the kind of answer i was expecting :)
So you are not confortable enough with it to merge for 2.20, right ?
I'am going to try to port system-monitor to it.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description
Le samedi 19 mai 2007 à 22:52 -0700, David Zeuthen a écrit :
Hi,
On Sun, 2007-05-20 at 00:58 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Le samedi 19 mai 2007 à 00:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 15:01 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Hello,
It all depends what
Le samedi 19 mai 2007 à 00:06 +0100, Bastien Nocera a écrit :
On Fri, 2007-05-18 at 15:01 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Hello,
It all depends what for. But most (newly written) apps should use
PolicyKit as it allows just for that sort of thing.
http://webcvs.freedesktop.org/hal/PolicyKit
a look at what
other people are using.
In the end, may be we could agree to use the same library for
consistency and ask for it to be an official external dependency.
Thanks.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description
/show_bug.cgi?id=352807
No, it's too hard and i don't have the hardware to test.
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Hello,
libgtop has been branched.
The stable releases will now happen in the /branches/gnome-2-14 (fourteen)
branch.
Developpement happens in /trunk.
Ciao,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une
Le lundi 09 avril 2007 à 19:32 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
Hi,
gtkmm is now allowed as a dependency.
Is it only gtkmm or also the bindings for gnomevfs, gconf, etc ?
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description
Hello,
system-monitor has been branched. The stable releases will now happen
in the /branches/gnome-2-18 branch. Developpement happens in /trunk.
Bye,
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une
a specific version of its API) to be useful.
Does this mean that it is actually possible to compile nm-applet without
compiling NetworkManager or having NetworkManager dev files installed
and install nm-applet without installing NetworkManager ?
--
Benoît Dejean
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop
Le samedi 28 octobre 2006 à 11:55 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
On 10/27/06, Benoît Dejean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don't do that. I'm very disappointed : why haven't you talk
to
me before doing that ? I would have explained. I was about to ask for
help for autotools
Le jeudi 26 octobre 2006 à 13:44 -0600, Elijah Newren a écrit :
Hi Benoit,
It looks like you recently added a dependency on pcre to
gnome-system-monitor. Since this isn't one of the approved external
dependencies at
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointSeventeen/ExternalDependencies, I have
The stable branch is gnome-2-16 and the development branch is HEAD.
--
Benoît Dejean
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message numériquement signée
Le vendredi 09 décembre 2005 à 16:22 +0100, Xavier Bestel a écrit :
Some plans apart from breaking the ABI compatibility ?
* configure.in:
* glibtop.h:
* include/glibtop/cpu.h:
* include/glibtop/procmap.h:
Increased GLIBTOP_NCPU to 32.
Added
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 00:29 +0800, Davyd Madeley a écrit :
On Thu, 2005-10-27 at 11:05 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
perhaps
we can afford to spend a little bit of memory to get some really kick
arse features.
define little. 22MB is not little for me and a lot of users. Most
Le vendredi 28 octobre 2005 à 16:04 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Hi,
I'd like to see pessulus included in GNOME Desktop 2.14, and therefore,
surprise surprise, I'm proposing it for inclusion.
Pessulus is a lockdown editor for GNOME, written in python.
This time i'm OK with memory usage
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 21:04 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen a
écrit :
(What about beagle ?)
We have a beagle plugin based on libbeagle (by Raphael Slinckx)
-bindings. An it rocks I might add; I had no idea beagle was this fast.
I mean seriously fast.
what the difference between your
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 10:32 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele a écrit :
On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 19:18 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 19:04 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele a
écrit :
Hi,
hi
But are you sure that 10 python applets would each consume 22 MB ? How
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 13:32 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a
écrit :
Qui, 2005-10-27 às 11:05 +0200, Benoît Dejean escreveu:
The result: a single process (per user, per display), and a single
main loop, for all applets. Of course this means if one applet
deadlocks or dies, they all
Le mardi 25 octobre 2005 à 00:35 +0200, Benoît Dejean a écrit :
Le dimanche 23 octobre 2005 à 19:19 +0200, Raphael Slinckx a écrit :
- Memory usage on startup : 22MB RES
this is the highest memory usage after X on startup.
(for the record, the second biggest applet is wnck
Le jeudi 27 octobre 2005 à 14:06 +0200, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen a
écrit :
We are aware of memory- and startup issues, but you surely know that
premature optimisation is a top-three killer in free software projects.
of course. It's also premature to say 'we can do much better, later'.
We
Le mardi 25 octobre 2005 à 22:26 +0200, Raphael Slinckx a écrit :
Hi !
i meant 6s startup with CPU 100%
Yes that's a problem and we will be fixing it, but if you install the
applet you are accepting it's drawbacks.
You said :
This mail introduces the deskbar-applet, and officially
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 18:32 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele a
écrit :
Hi,
That excludes lots of users, me being the first.
I'm sad to here it. Fully understood : you don't care about many of us
(users. You don't mind ruining everyone else improvements. You're right,
time is
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 19:04 +0200, Thomas Vander Stichele a
écrit :
Hi,
But are you sure that 10 python applets would each consume 22 MB ? How
much of this 22 MB would be shared among python applets ?
In my my first email, i reported that deskbar-applet takes 22MB RES :
10MB are
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 20:15 +0200, Vincent Untz a écrit :
Le mercredi 26 octobre 2005 à 18:50 +0200, Benoît Dejean a écrit :
Of course i'm overreacting. I'm quotting Davyd :
Inclusion into Desktop should not be a sign of any particular standard
or quality, but simply
Le mardi 25 octobre 2005 à 15:57 +0100, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro a
écrit :
Ter, 2005-10-25 às 14:39 +0100, Mike Hearn escreveu:
Finally, I should mention that a future pygtk version should decrease
memory usage, and improve startup time, by registering GObject wrappers
on demand, and by
Le dimanche 23 octobre 2005 à 19:19 +0200, Raphael Slinckx a écrit :
== Requirements ==
Required dependencies:
* Python 2.3 or above
:/
- deskbar-applet startup is as long as full gnome startup: 6s for
loading the applet on my ppc 1GHz.
- Memory usage on startup : 22MB RES
this is
Le lundi 24 octobre 2005 à 14:32 -0400, Walter J. Mazurowski a écrit :
Hi!
this is ... sorry i can't find the bug# anymore.
Just have a look at /proc/diskstats : stats about dm-* are all 0. So no
stats for LVM/DM devices. (same with /sys/block/dm-*/stat).
Sorry.
--
Je cherche un emploi de
Le mardi 25 octobre 2005 à 13:13 +1000, Nigel Tao a écrit :
On Tue, 2005-10-25 at 00:35 +0200, Benoît Dejean wrote:
Start-up time may not be that big an issue if it's a one-off and doesn't
stop you otherwise using your desktop. This may be a bigger concern for
those who want to replace
The stable branch is gnome-2-12 and the development branch is HEAD.
--
Benoît Dejean
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
The stable branch is gnome-2-10 and the development branch is HEAD.
--
Benot Dejean TazForEver AT dlfp DOT org
JID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GNOME http://www.gnomefr.org/
LibGTop http://directory.fsf.org/libgtop.html
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
51 matches
Mail list logo