, and that *something* has to be done to
reach a solution that combines a high degree of usability with easily
accessible ways to act environmentally responsible.
Best regards,
Denis Washington
[1] https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
___
desktop-devel
Am 01.09.2011 15:22, schrieb Allan Day:
Hey Denis!
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Denis Washingtonden...@online.de wrote:
Am 01.09.2011 11:34, schrieb Frederic Peters:
Hello all,
This is 3.1.90, and it's out! It's the first beta of what will be
GNOME 3.2, enjoy it while it's time, the
solutions such as better cross-desktop settings
integration is in order. However, I think that for the time being the
.desktop file solution is sensible.
Regards,
Denis Washington
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http
Am 23.07.2011 12:33, schrieb Emmanuele Bassi:
On 2011-07-23 at 11:27, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Matthias Clasenmatthias.cla...@gmail.com a écrit:
I don't think Shauns proposal addresses the issue, really.
Why? Do you have an example that would show where Shaun's proposal
falls short?
it
Hello,
My name is Denis Washington and I am a first-semester Computer Science
student at the Humboldt University Berlin, Germany. Being a student now,
I would love to finally participate in this year's Google Summer of
Code. Therefore, I'd like to present you my project idea and am asking
Patryk Zawadzki wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Vincent Untz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If this is a major issue, we should either reach consensus that GTK+
should revert this ASAP or decide to fix all our .glade/.ui files now.
The latter won't help with applications we don't
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 14:18 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 01:39:33PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
If a program has a name obviously related to what it does, *or* lots of
marketing, you're fine. But if you're missing both, people will
So it seems that everyone prefers Extension to Plugin or any
others, in theory anyway. But the implementation or change would be
significant, perhaps not even worthwhile.
But if the currently recommended terminology of plugin isn't being
observed or enforced, wouldn't it at least be
On Mon, 2007-11-05 at 17:57 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 18:59 +0100, Denis Washington wrote:
Hi,
I created two mockups for possible keyboard and mouse capplets in GNOME
2.20. Their aim is to incorporate accessibility features in both; the
existing keyboard a11y
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:27 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 10/31/07, Jürg Billeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 18:59 +0100, Denis Washington wrote:
I created two mockups for possible keyboard and mouse capplets in GNOME
2.20. Their aim is to incorporate accessibility
In Ubuntu, the touchpad tab is only shown if you have a touchpad.
Regards,
Denis
On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 12:24 +0100, Étienne Bersac wrote:
Hi,
Running Gutsy, the mouse-properties capplet does have a touchpad tab.
But the mockup drops it. Unless this is planned, this is a regression.
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 13:44 +0100, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 19:20 +0100, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le samedi 13 octobre 2007, à 14:25 +0200, Francesco Fumanti a écrit :
Hello,
During the accessibility summit last weekend, an new accessibility
application called
Hi,
I created two mockups for possible keyboard and mouse capplets in GNOME
2.20. Their aim is to incorporate accessibility features in both; the
existing keyboard a11y features into Keyboard and the already discussed
Mousetweaks settings into Mouse. The mockups can be found here:
Keyboard:
On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 16:54 +, Calum Benson wrote:
On 31 Oct 2007, at 13:54, Denis Washington wrote:
I have made a mockup that integrates Mousetweaks settings into the
mouse
capplet:
http://ultimum-projekt.de/mockups/mouse.html
I hope I haven't forgotten everything
I would really go with this design, I don't know why very few
other alternative menus follow this concept.
Denis, which design are you referring to here?
I meant the concept of multiple smaller menus instead of one big one,
like now with Applications/Places/System.
On Wed, 2007-10-10 at 12:43 -0500, Benjamin Gramlich wrote:
Do you mean the one pictured
http://linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/celena/mintmenu.png?
Yeah, that's the one. Sorry I wasn't more clear and didn't attach a link
to a picture. It's not a drop-in replacement for the current
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 20:06 +0100, Philip Withnall wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 20:44 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Hi,
Le lundi 24 septembre 2007, à 04:00 +0100, Alex Jones a écrit :
Hi list
What do we want from the next version of GNOME Panel?
Do we want to
Hi,
I created a patch to bring a bit more bling to the GNOME panel. It uses
a ghost-effect animation as laucnher feedback instead of the current
expanding square if a compositing manager is running. The patch can be
found here:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=479562
Regards.
Denis
18 matches
Mail list logo
