Hi Stef!
First of all, thanks a lot for you great work on seahorse!
On 12/9/07, Stef Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As was discussed before on this list, I'd suggest we remove
> gnome-keyring-manager from the 'desktop' distribution for 2.22. The tool
> may have uses elsewhere, but I'm not su
Hi,
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 5:32 PM, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PRIMARY ARGUMENTS FOR ENABLING A11Y BY DEFAULT:
[...]
> 2) The a11y infrastructure can be used for more things than just a11y.
> Consider, for example, an on screen keyboard for devices w/o physical
> keyboards.
I'd
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:54 PM, Christian Persch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However, glade-3 is still not working on all features in the gtkbuilder
> format (e.g. nautilus' and gnome-terminal's .ui files break badly when
> edited with glade-3).
What about using gazpacho?
Salu2
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 12:36 AM, Christian Neumair wrote:
> However, this fix is important enough to be applied by all distributors
> to all the supported Nautilus releases that are still out there,
> including LTS distributions. Is there any standard procedure for
> notifying distributors of su
On Mon, May 24, 2010 at 11:37 PM, wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been off and on reading this book: http://www.gtkbook.com/ and
> have looked into the devhelp program, as well as a little gstreamer. Does
> anyone have any recommendations for me as to how to get started developing
> applications for
Hi,
How is the accessibility support on the htm greater?
El 13/05/2011 14:59, "Robert Ancell" escribió:
> I'm proposing LightDM [1] as a replacement for GDM. I started the
> proposal for this in GNOME 3.0 [2] but due to the young age of the
> project I thought it better to wait until 3.2 before m
Wops, I moved the conversation offlist. Getting back to d-d-l.
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 4:06 PM, Robert Ancell wrote:
> On 13 May 2011 15:56, Fernando Herrera wrote:
>> What about starting AT applications like orca to use them to interact with
>> the greater?
>
> Yes,
Hi,
On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:01 AM, Robert Ancell wrote:
>> So, how? I mean, currently I don't see anycode on lighDM for this. Are
>> you going to solve that at the distro level using some kind of script
>> that would start the greeter and then the required AT?
>
> This logic would need to be in
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 4:03 AM, Robert Ancell wrote:
> If we look at the LightDM repository there is an example GTK greeter.
> This uses GTK, so it has ATK support.
Yes, is has ATK support as the calculator has. However, the login
manager should start also the AT technologies
> But I think the
Hi,
right now you can globally disable bug-buddy dialog setting globally
the env variable GNOME_DISABLE_CRASH_DIALOG (you can do in the system
profile, for example).
You could hack bugzillas xml file to set up another destination
addresses, but there is no way to skip all bug-buddy assistant page
On 12/17/05, Andy Tai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting... this looks like a solution looking for a problem. There is
> no problem the autotools present to GNOME that could not be solved. All the
> weaknesses you listed about autotools clearly are not issues for GNOME
> developers, or else
Hi all!
I've just branched bug-buddy and gconf-editor for gnome-2-12. New
development will hapen in HEAD. I know that I'm a bit late for 2.13.x
development, but I have been with zero time last months.
Highlights for bug-buddy roadmap:
* XML-RPC method for submitting bugs replacing ancient sendmai
Hi,
The problem I see with Orca in current state for including it in the
Desktop is the zero-integration with Preferences. I mean, how is an
user supposed to launch Orca?. Currently you need to enable a11y using
gnome-at-properties do not enable "Screen Reader", then you need to
launch orca from c
Hi all,
I've just branched gconf-editor for gnome-2-14.
New development (mostly bug fixes and maybe some minor features) are
going to happen on HEAD.
Salu2
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/
Hello,
current vesion of bug-buddy (HEAD) has a working "--include" option.
The idea of this option is to get info about non-standards crashes.
Non standard crashes are, for example, python, C# or java Falta Exceptions.
With current C applications we are getting all segfaults from
libgnomeui han
On 6/18/06, Gustavo Carneiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This sounds like a very good idea. But could you give more details?
> What does the --include option accept? A string, file name, ...? I
> rather pass information through a pipe, really, anything else is bound
> to reach either a cmdli
On 7/21/06, Brent Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bug-buddy is pretty much maintainerless from what I can tell - Fer is
> not very active, and I have my hands full with Yelp. Is there someone
> out there that would be interested in taking bug-buddy by both reins?
Well, here it's Fer :)
I am
On 7/21/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/21/06, Jason D. Clinton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-07-21 at 21:06 +0200, Fernando Herrera wrote:
> > > Anyway, I did my best to get new bug-buddy interface and internal
> > > re
On 7/22/06, Matthias Clasen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/21/06, Fernando Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Yeah, they are:
> >
> > [example for gnome-calculator .desktop file]
> >
> > X-GNOME-Bugzilla-Bugzilla=GNOME
> > X-GNOME-Bug
On 7/26/06, James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. gnome-settings-daemon is modified to set the gtk-modules XSETTING,
> based on the existing gconf key. If accessibility is enabled, it sets
> it to "libgail:libatk-bridge".
So if we are moving to this solution we could also add a
"gnome_
ave installed gnome a11y
modules then we are adding a little bit of overhead to only-gtk
applications (loading gnome-module because it is installed, loading
gconf, checking a11y).
Salu2
On 7/26/06, James Henstridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/07/06, Fernando Herrera <[EMAIL PR
On 8/13/06, Vincent Untz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le dimanche 13 août 2006, à 00:44, Olav Vitters a écrit :
> > Bug-Buddy now requires either a .desktop or a .server file for your
> > application that has the following information in that file (adjust
> > accordingly for bonobo .server stuff):
On 8/13/06, Frédéric Bellaiche <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's say I have customized this way " epiphany.deskop". I ended up with a
> customized "epiphany.desktop" in ~/local/share/applications. And then
> imagine I'm migrating to 2.16. The "epiphany.desktop" (inside
> /usr/share/applications) w
pmap" output is smaller and prettier, but is it installed
on all GNOME supported platforms?
Salu2
On 8/13/06, Fernando Herrera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/13/06, Behdad Esfahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Another thing that may be very easy to get in Bug-Buddy, yet
On 10/15/06, Sven Herzberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The idea sounds pretty good. I just have one question: If I run a beta
> as my first GNOME, the gconf key will be set to TRUE, will it
> automatically switch to FALSE once I upgrade to stable GNOME? (Will it
> work the other way around?)
I'd
On 11/1/06, Willie Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So
It seems as though the right thing to do is enable accessibility in the
default schema for development releases. Anyone have a clue for how to
do this?
We can use a autoconf variable on the schema file and expand it
depending on min
Hi all,
I've just branched gnome-keyring-manager for 2.16.
New development is going to happen on HEAD
Salu2
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
Hi,
I branched bug-buddy silently some days ago. I cannot remember if my
plan was mailing d-d-l and friends in the next morning, but I
completely forgot about it.
So the hot question: what's expected on 2.17 regarding bug-buddy?.
1) Some polishing of the new UI
2) When no debug symbols are prese
On 11/28/06, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> as the GNOME community and user base grows, we have to handle more and
> more reports, which either means that the bugsquad needs more volunteer
> triagers, or that we need more automation.
> the latter one should be the way to go.
I'm trying
On 1/30/07, Ross Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sure. Rip the code out of libgnomeui, clean it up and slap it into
> libegg or somewhere. I wonder if bugbuddy could provide a GtkModule
> that could be loaded by GTK+ and do the hook?
Yeah, that's the plan for GNOME 2.19. The GTK_MODULE stuff
On 2/5/07, Mariano Suárez-Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a portable way to have bug-buddy add to reports the version of
> a particular lib the crashed app is using? I'd like, in particular, to
> know which vte is gnome-terminal using.
I guess that there is not "portable"
On 3/14/07, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-13 at 12:52 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
> > If a program works correctly with Python 2.4, is there
> > actually a danger of it not working correctly with 2.5?
> > That sounds broken.
>
> Python 2.4 and 2.5 install in parallel s
Sorry about this, I have been terribly busy these last weeks, expect
new bug-buddy stuff coming during GUADEC.
Salu2
On 7/10/07, Jani Monoses <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ross Burton wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 02:24 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> >>> Personally, I'd make gnome-session do
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:13:49 -0500, Luis Villa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:09:08 +1100, Jeff Waugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * gnome-keyring-manager
> >
> > Very little discussion about it this time around, and it hasn't had regular
> > releases during the development pe
Elijah: would this timestamp be ok here?
PS: I know that #error "libwnck should only be used if you understand
that it's subject to frequent change, and is not supported as a fixed
API/ABI or as part of the platform" but these internal API changes 6
days before hard code freeze are painful! :)
to stick? How
> will GOK maintain compatability with new/old versions of libwnck?
> (preprocessor directives?)
>
> cheers,
>
> David
>
> Fernando Herrera wrote:
>
> >Elijah: would this timestamp be ok here?
> >
> >PS: I know that #error &q
El lun, 07-03-2005 a las 20:44 +, Bastien Nocera escribiÃ:
> On Mon, 2005-03-07 at 21:15 +0100, Christian Persch wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to add a new external dependency to GNOME Desktop: the
> > "iso-codes" package. It's available from cvs
> > [http://alioth.debian.org/projects/pkg-is
El dom, 13-03-2005 a las 11:39 +, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
escribiÃ:
>
> What bug-buddy should do is just invoke a mailto: handler, and let
> evolution/whatever send the email, using the options already configured
> personally by the user, and which are known to work well.
That is not an
Hello. I've just branched bug-buddy. CVS HEAD is now for GNOME 2.11
development. Current stable branch is gnome-2-10.
Main plans for bug-buddy during 2.11 Development cycle:
* Include xml-rpc support.
* Convince every maintainer to include a "Submit bug Report"
entry in every GNOME Desktop Appl
Hello,
I have just branched gconf-editor. gnome-2-10 branch is now for stable
releases for 2.10.x series, and HEAD is where new features, UI and major
code changes will hapen.
Thanks.
Salu2
__
Renovamos el Correo Yahoo!
Nuevos se
40 matches
Mail list logo
