As some people might like this... Thanks Frederic!
Forwarded Message
From: Frederic Peters
To: Ikke
Subject: Re: JHBuild setup and RSS feeds
Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:37:57 +0200
Ikke wrote:
As I proposed on GNOME's desktop-devel list today, it'd be really cool
if there'd
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 22:00 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote:
4) profit!
Good luck ;)
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
on top of that when
appropriate.
Just my .02,
Ikke
http://www.eikke.com
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
all great stuff Novell got out there on my
desktop... There should be some good way to say Thank you.
Kind regards,
Ikke
http://www.eikke.com
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
-o abitest abitest.c
$ ./abitest
sizeof(void *) == 4
sizeof(fptr) == 4
But I guess you knew that already ^o)
Ikke
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
autotool
problems just before a release tarball should be made,...
Ikke
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-pedantic -Werror is not going to fly. See e.g.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310175
Then we got some work to do ;-)
IMHO these CFLAGS force devs to write cleaner (and sometimes even more
secure) code, which is a good thing :-)
Ikke
make a tinderbox with make distcheck and
CFLAGS+=-Wall -Werror -pedantic -ansi would be so cool ;-)
Ikke
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
around my
thoughts.
G'night,
Ikke
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
in the beginning. desktop-devel would be
flooded I think.
Ikke
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
When it comes to providing feedback bug-buddy seems to me like the right
place to put this.
Isn't bug-buddy supposed never to be seen by the user, in an ideal
scenario (i.e. we have no crashing applications)?
Regards,
Ikke
http://www.eikke.com
)
Just my .02
Ikke
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
-centered way, see the proof
of concept [2] I made some time ago. Maybe it's just useless nonsense
what I made there, not usefull at all, whatever ;-)
It's great to see people working Topaz ideas out (as seen before [3]),
I'm sure when Topaz lands it'll be a real First class desktop :-)
Regards,
Ikke
If GConf is making login slow, I think we should fix GConf. :-)
Nat
Nat: http://www.google.be/search?hl=nlclient=firefoxrls=org.mozilla%
3Aen-US%3Aunofficialq=dconf+site%3Afreedesktop.orgbtnG=Zoekenmeta=
http://freax.be/wiki/index.php/Temporary_location_for_D-Conf_specs
Ikke
http
in a desktop app of course, which
GDM/gnome-session can't predict nor prevent.
Karel Demeyer
http://gnometux.blogspot.com
Ikke
http://www.eikke.com
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo
15 matches
Mail list logo
