JHBuild setup and RSS feeds

2006-04-22 Thread Ikke
As some people might like this... Thanks Frederic! Forwarded Message From: Frederic Peters <> To: Ikke <> Subject: Re: JHBuild setup and RSS feeds Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:37:57 +0200 Ikke wrote: > As I proposed on GNOME's desktop-devel list today, it&#

Re: gnome-applets branched

2006-04-13 Thread Ikke
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 22:00 +0800, Davyd Madeley wrote: > 4) profit! Good luck ;) ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: [gpm] Re: Gnome 2.16 Module Proposal: GNOME Power Manager

2006-04-10 Thread Ikke
base interface is a must, extra implementation-specific calls can be added on top of that when appropriate. Just my .02, Ikke http://www.eikke.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: policy request: 'make uninstall' should work

2006-04-10 Thread Ikke
an RSS feed from the failure data somehow, so one can add it to his/her aggregator... Regards, Ikke http://www.eikke.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: NLD10 and GNOME

2006-02-07 Thread Ikke
x27;t wait to get all great stuff Novell got out there on my desktop... There should be some good way to say "Thank you". Kind regards, Ikke http://www.eikke.com ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gno

Re: libgnome goption argument parsing and ABI stability

2006-01-15 Thread Ikke
printf("sizeof(fptr) == %d\n", sizeof(fptr)); return 0; } $ gcc -o abitest abitest.c $ ./abitest sizeof(void *) == 4 sizeof(fptr) == 4 But I guess you knew that already ^o) Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Moving to bonjour over howl

2005-09-15 Thread Ikke
On Thu, 2005-09-15 at 09:18 -0400, JP Rosevear wrote: > Is there any reason not to prefer bonjour over howl now? Apple has > re-licensed the client portions of the library under BSD like howl and > almost certainly bonjour will be better tested. What's wrong wit

Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

2005-07-18 Thread Ikke
list to send failure notices too, because lots of them will happen, especially in the beginning. desktop-devel would be flooded I think. Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

2005-07-18 Thread Ikke
now on, appareantly I haven't got the knowledge or I'm not in the correct position to spread around my thoughts. G'night, Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

2005-07-18 Thread Ikke
g? Seriously, then I want ebuilds provided for every package too. Nah, just kidding. Personally I don't think this is a good idea, as it would give one distribution a "higher" state than others, which is not what we want (I guess?) Ikke ___

Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

2005-07-18 Thread Ikke
Nor does forcing > > all maintainers to learn more auto* seem like a reasonable use of > > anyone's time. > > > > It would certainly make tinderbox builds much slower, since e.g. > distchecking gtk requires building the docs. > > Matthias I think the a

Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

2005-07-18 Thread Ikke
pedantic -ansi" would be so cool ;-) > > > > -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Werror is not going to fly. See e.g. > > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310175 Then we got some work to do ;-) IMHO these CFLAGS force devs to write cleaner (and sometimes

Re: make distcheck in tinderbox [was Re: make check failures- gnome-vfs, e-d-s, at-spi]

2005-07-18 Thread Ikke
co, not running in major autotool problems just before a release tarball should be made,... Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: xscreensaver, any plan do drop it !!

2005-07-06 Thread Ikke
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 12:10 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote: > I think you could write a Qt dialog if you wanted to. KDE guys already got some own screensaver app IIRC... Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org h

Re: Modifying GNOME-About to count users

2005-07-05 Thread Ikke
> When it comes to providing feedback bug-buddy seems to me like the right > place to put this. Isn't bug-buddy supposed never to be seen by the user, in an ideal scenario (i.e. we have no crashing applications)? Regards, Ikke http://ww

Re: Some thoughts about window management

2005-06-22 Thread Ikke
ication Area spec (as an icon server, or however that's called) Just my .02 Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: [OT] Three Point Zero - Idea Mockups

2005-05-26 Thread Ikke
e as a primary target). Which does not imply I think you're moving it away. If you interpreted my mail as a personal attack or something, I swear (is that the correct spelling?) it was not meant like that. Currently Soylent brainstorming/development is going well, and I don't see any reas

Re: Three Point Zero - Idea Mockups

2005-05-25 Thread Ikke
re it belongs (think I18N etc). If Soylent would move away from Gnome and it's community I'll do everything I can to make this not happen :-) Next to that: where should we comment on the mockups now? It looks like there's no place to do this at all now? Regards

Re: Three Point Zero - Idea Mockups

2005-05-24 Thread Ikke
be it's just useless nonsense what I made there, not usefull at all, whatever ;-) It's great to see people working Topaz ideas out (as seen before [3]), I'm sure when Topaz lands it'll be a real "First class desktop" :-) Regards, Ikke http://www.eikke.com [1] http://ga

Re: GUADEC Hacking

2005-04-11 Thread Ikke
> If GConf is making login slow, I think we should fix GConf. :-) > > Nat Nat: http://www.google.be/search?hl=nl&client=firefox&rls=org.mozilla% 3Aen-US%3Aunofficial&q=dconf+site%3Afreedesktop.org&btnG=Zoeken&meta= http://freax.be/wiki/index.php/Temporary_location

Re: Xlock on login

2005-01-28 Thread Ikke
tor the screensaver. I already did that (its +- working, using DBUS), CDIS should solve this in a "nicer" way though. > Ross Ikke ___ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list

Re: Xlock on login

2005-01-28 Thread Ikke
On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 16:51 +, Ross Burton wrote: > On Fri, 2005-01-28 at 17:16 +0100, Ikke wrote: > > > Once Galago is integrated, it will "see" that your session is xlocked, > > > so it will declare you as "away from your computer". So people won

Re: Xlock on login

2005-01-28 Thread Ikke
> Once Galago is integrated, it will "see" that your session is xlocked, > so it will declare you as "away from your computer". So people won't > hate you. But Galago, although a very promising project, is not integrated, and won'

Re: Xlock on login

2005-01-28 Thread Ikke
D), or do some other bad things. That'd be due to a bug in a desktop app of course, which GDM/gnome-session can't predict nor prevent. > Karel Demeyer > http://gnometux.blogspot.com Ikke http://www.eikke.com ___ desktop-devel-list mail