On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 11:30 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> - Cairo support: is in CVS, and seems to work reasonably well. The main
> question mark here is if we are confident that the Cairo api as of
> 0.5.0 is stable enough for our purposes. Ideally, we'd have an
> officially api-stable
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:39 +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> If we're talking about performance/stability in the context of whether
> GNOME 2.12 should use GTK+ 2.8, we're effectively saying "I think the
> GTK+ team might ship a unstable or unacceptably slow 2.8.0 release;
> GNOME shouldn't co
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 10:49 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> first 'column' of times is gtk 2.6, second is gtk/cairo HEAD of
> yesterday, both with the Mist theme:
>
> GtkEntry - time: 0.43 0.76
> GtkComboBox - time: 12.61 15.30
> GtkComboBoxEntry - time: 11.95 13.25
> GtkSpinButton - time: 0.65 1.09
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 15:12 -0400, Luis Villa wrote:
> I should have mentioned that this was with N=1000; jkh, I'm assuming
> you did the default n=100?
Correct.
If anybody is interested, here are numbers over remote display. The
network is 802.11g wireless LAN, ping time 1.3 ms. N still 100.
J
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 19:56 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:20 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Looking at the schedule I thought I'd missed the time period left for
> > new modules, but looking again it appears we still have a small amount
> > of time. I'd like
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 11:28 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> If you guys want a specific productive suggestion, I think these are two
> de facto directions that could just be adopted; one is a kind of
> building block platform shared among the GNOME desktop, Maemo, GPE, XFCE
> even [2]; it might be
