> > You know what to do.
>
Lies! Should I write something about java-atk-wrapper or is it just the
core module maintainers you're wanting to hear from about this? :D
Magdalen
___
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.
> > Perhaps the ideal solution would be to decouple the dependencies. When
> > I'm trying to fix up some mail protocol back end in Evolution, I really
> > *shouldn't* need to upgrade my entire system to the very latest
> > glib/gtk+ and then upgrade a whole bunch of *applications* which for
> > som
I am unfamiliar with this API so I can't say much about your problem, but I
had a little look at the git log and I reckon following commit might
include a change which is relevant to your problem with the update:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/libsoup/commit/?id=78e74de238479c2cc316cf6f888c53ddd087b
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez <
csori...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Magdalen,
>
> Thanks for your kind words.
> Still people like Allan and other people did a lot of work on this as well.
> I can provide my feelings when started contributing and personal vision,
> but they
Hi Allan,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez <
csori...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Allan,
>
> So if we continue with the wiki, most of the points I pointed before
> continue to be a problem...
>
> New jhbuild/git/whatever tutorials will came up... people won't find the
> approp
+1
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Carlos Soriano Sanchez <
csori...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So after some work in GnomeLove and discussions in the gnome-love list, I
> would like to make this proposal.
> Read more here https://wiki.gnome.org/CarlosSoriano/GnomeLoveMoveTask
>
> So I would
Hi Jason,
It's not clear who you are targeting so it's difficult to answer your
questions. Do you questions relate to hardware or software features?
For what it's worth: as far as I am aware, the only market for PCs
preinstalled with linux are people who are new to linux. Assuming that is a
fair
Hi Daniel,
If you already built 'something' which had adwaita-icon-theme as a
dependency, then all its dependencies would have to have been built too at
that time. In other words, you already built all those modules at some
point and that is why they would get skipped even if you were runing
the '
Hi Jan,
I think that in most European countries you can't legally "force" a
> non-local jurisdiction on an individual volunteer, so that part of the
> "contract"[*] would be legally very dubious...
>
Citation needed. Your definition of "forced" here is also bit dubious imho.
[*] I'm not sure if
Hi Benjamin,
You raise an interesting point.
Back when I was freelancing as an audio engineer I used to pay for this
kind of cover myself and it costed around £130 a year for an individual.
The work I do for my charity (Scottish based) is covered by the charity as
are our disclosures (for working
ay to
automate that?
[1]
https://git.gnome.org/browse/java-atk-wrapper/commit/?id=3694129866ad40b3ee5a66f8ea7bb02f8ae5
Thanks!
Magdalen
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 8:10 PM, Magdalen Berns
wrote:
> Hi Alejandro,
>
> Thanks for the speedy response on this. Here's the commit
> http
Hi Alejandro,
Thanks for the speedy response on this. Here's the commit
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738709
I excite [1]
Magdalen
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jKlxjbhB9HE
On Fri, Oct 17, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Alejandro Piñeiro
wrote:
>
> On 10/17/2014 07:46 P
Hi Alejandro,
I sent a email to the previous maintainers as Bastien mentioned. After some
> months without answer, and after mentioning it on one of the weekly
> meetings of the accessibility team, I added myself as maintainer, without
> removing Ke Want. It is true that probably it would be good
Hi Alejandro,
Thanks for clarifying.
As I said when I somewhat took over java-atk-wrapper [3], if I added
> myself as maintainer was mostly in order to have an updated contact, and
> more important, even if I didn't plan to work directly on it, at least
> having someone to review the patches the
17, 2014 at 6:09 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-10-17 at 17:54 +0100, Magdalen Berns wrote:
> > On 2014-10-17 16:37, Magdalen Berns
> > wrote:
> > I would like to support the new java wrapper
> > mai
>
> On 2014-10-17 16:37, Magdalen Berns wrote:
>
>> I would like to support the new java wrapper maintainer, Alejandro with
>> the
>> task of maintaining java-atk-wrapper since the whole module needs updating
>> having been abandoned back in 2011 until recent
Hi list,
I would like to support the new java wrapper maintainer, Alejandro with the
task of maintaining java-atk-wrapper since the whole module needs updating
having been abandoned back in 2011 until recently when I submitted a patch
to allow it to be built successfully on the latest version of G
17 matches
Mail list logo
