Re: Replacing "master" reference in git branch names (was Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules)

2019-05-04 Thread Michael Hill via desktop-devel-list
On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 10:44 AM Ask Hjorth Larsen via desktop-devel-list wrote: > * The proposed link between master branch and slavery is based on > arguments that require a dictionary and etymological analysis. But if > we think master has bad connotations, this is a question of how it > work

Re: Replacing "master" reference in git branch names (was Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules)

2019-05-03 Thread Michael Hill via desktop-devel-list
On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 8:08 AM Carmen Bianca Bakker wrote: > The shitstorm is to be expected one way or another. The only difference > would be whether GNOME or The Linux Foundation is smeared in internet > comments as "SJWs changing things and I don't like it". Better us than them, because they

Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules

2019-04-25 Thread Michael Hill via desktop-devel-list
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 10:22 AM, Pat Suwalski wrote: Doesn't change the fact that it's accurate, and is the correct computer terminology. Surely if GNOME can be inclusive of someone who uses SJW as a slur, we can accomodate someone who has a different understanding of the words master an

Re: Proposal: Replace all references to master/slave in GNOME modules

2019-04-25 Thread Michael Hill via desktop-devel-list
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 7:24 AM David Woodhouse wrote: > As a software engineer, I much prefer to fix bugs rather than paper > over them with workarounds. And if the bug here is that some people > wouldn't pass a high school comprehension test because they can't tell > the difference between diff